Comparison Overview

Atlanta Commercial Tire Group

VS

Collision Repair Group

Atlanta Commercial Tire Group

5067 Kennedy Rd Forest Park, Georgia 30297, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.actire.com

We strive to be the premier commercial tire service provider in the state of Georgia by offering first in class products while keeping in mind the best interests of each individual customer. Our ultimate goal is not being the lowest priced tire dealer, but instead being the lowest cost dealer for any size fleet.

NAICS: 811
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Collision Repair Group

Maple Drive, Hinckley, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
https://www.crg-diagnostics.com

CRG-Diagnostics specialise in bringing our fully mobile vehicle ADAS Recalibration, Diagnostics and Coding solutions to you on a UK wide basis. Our focus is purely on delivering the support services you require on a same day / next day basis via our fully mobile business model which ensures that you - and your clients - receive a seamless customer experience. This means you can mitigate the additional costs and potential customer service issues usually incurred when experiencing additional capacity demands on your network due to seasonal, surge or even an expected but short term increases in business volumes. Our client base is solely made up of the leading blue chip automotive brands within the UK who share our passion for excellence and are driven by customer satisfaction. (All posts are for illustration purposes only and do not represent our workmanship unless stated)

NAICS: 811
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-commercial-tire-inc.jpeg
Atlanta Commercial Tire Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/collision-repair-group.jpeg
Collision Repair Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlanta Commercial Tire Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Collision Repair Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Vehicle Repair and Maintenance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Commercial Tire Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Vehicle Repair and Maintenance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Collision Repair Group in 2026.

Incident History — Atlanta Commercial Tire Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Commercial Tire Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Collision Repair Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Collision Repair Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-commercial-tire-inc.jpeg
Atlanta Commercial Tire Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/collision-repair-group.jpeg
Collision Repair Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Collision Repair Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Collision Repair Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company.

In the current year, Collision Repair Group company and Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Collision Repair Group company nor Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Collision Repair Group company nor Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Collision Repair Group company nor Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company nor Collision Repair Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company nor Collision Repair Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Collision Repair Group company employs more people globally than Atlanta Commercial Tire Group company, reflecting its scale as a Vehicle Repair and Maintenance.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlanta Commercial Tire Group nor Collision Repair Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References