Comparison Overview

Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation

VS

Raw Cotton Australia

Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation

3000 Cobb International Blvd. NW, None, Kennesaw, GA, US, 30152
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation (ABW) has provided public and contract food-grade, temperature-controlled distribution services for over 60 years. Our award-winning facilities, superb metro Atlanta location, exceptional service, and excellent safety record combine to satisfy our customers’ most stringent risk management and customer service requirements. With our in-house carrier service and extensive network of interline partners, ABW is the only provider you need for your asset-based logistics needs in the Southeast.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 293
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Raw Cotton Australia

44 Francis St, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

WELCOME TO A NEW MARKETPLACE FOR AUSTRALIAN COTTON Raw Cotton Australia is the sister company to Rain Agribusiness; and the brainchild of co-directors Ian Grellman, Peter Horton, and Tim Whan. The team has combined their collective decades of supply chain knowledge to create a new marketplace for Australian cotton. We utilise modern warehouses located close to ports of Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne to make farmers'​ cotton readily available to many buyers; by facilitating the movement and sale of cotton post-ginning, on behalf of the Australian cotton farmers - and we and assist buyers in sourcing their requirements.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-bonded-warehouse-corporation.jpeg
Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raw-cotton-australia.jpeg
Raw Cotton Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Raw Cotton Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Raw Cotton Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Raw Cotton Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Raw Cotton Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-bonded-warehouse-corporation.jpeg
Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raw-cotton-australia.jpeg
Raw Cotton Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Raw Cotton Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Raw Cotton Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company.

In the current year, Raw Cotton Australia company and Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Raw Cotton Australia company nor Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Raw Cotton Australia company nor Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Raw Cotton Australia company nor Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company nor Raw Cotton Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company nor Raw Cotton Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation company employs more people globally than Raw Cotton Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Warehousing.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corporation nor Raw Cotton Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N