Comparison Overview

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo

VS

Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo

12800 Center Court Drive, Suite 300, None, Cerritos, CA, US, 90703
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo is a full-service law firm with over 200 attorneys in nine offices throughout California. We represent both private and public sector clients, with emphasis in the areas of employment, labor, construction, education, real estate, water, general business and business litigation, corporate and taxation. Through decades of dedicated commitment to high quality legal work and providing consistently practical management solutions to our clients, AALRR has earned a reputation as one of California’s leading law firms.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 412
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys

9 Rickmansworth Road, London, Hertfordshire, WD18 0JU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

European Patent Attorneys, Chartered Patent Attorneys (UK), UK Registered Trade Mark Attorneys. When you have an idea, that is all you have – an idea, nothing else. Because an idea is intangible, it cannot be protected until it is used to create something. Then it becomes Intellectual Property, which can be owned, traded in or licensed just like any other form of property. There are various forms of Intellectual Property. Patents, where applicable, give you exclusive ownership in an invention. Registered trademarks give you sole rights to use a sign or symbol to distinguish your goods or services, while Registered Design is a monopoly right in a product’s appearance. Then there’s Copyright. This automatically gives you a right to stop others from copying your work, while unregistered Design Right is there to stop others copying the design of your work. Complicated? Certainly, but even more so when you consider that one single item can be covered by more than one form of Intellectual Property. This is why this area of the law needs those who specialise solely in Intellectual Property law. As Patent and Trademark Attorneys, this is what we do: we do not practise in any other area of law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atkinson-andelson-loya-ruud-&-romo.jpeg
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saunders-&-dolleymore-llp.jpeg
Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys in 2025.

Incident History — Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atkinson-andelson-loya-ruud-&-romo.jpeg
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Physical Device (Laptop)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saunders-&-dolleymore-llp.jpeg
Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has not reported any.

In the current year, Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company and Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company employs more people globally than Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo nor Dolleymores - Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X