Comparison Overview

Athena Partners Strategy Group

VS

State of the Future

Athena Partners Strategy Group

Anaheim, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.athenapsg.com/

Athena’s exclusive focus on parking technology delivers unmatched insight and results, proven by hundreds of success stories from industry leaders who have transformed their operations with our expertise. As a premier technology representation and consultancy, APSG leverages a specialized network of partners to guide organizations in developing new business and launching innovative solutions across parking, transportation, curb management, rideshare, law enforcement, public safety, and EV charging sectors. Learn more at athenapsg.com. We offer over 100 years of combined industry experience in: ✔ Parking and parking enforcement ✔ Transportation and mobility ✔ Curb management and rideshare ✔ Law enforcement and public safety ✔ EV Charging and infrastructure Want to learn more about Athena Partners Strategy Group Representation? Contact us today!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

State of the Future

None, None, Austin, Texas, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
https://www.i4texas.org/

The “State of the Future” mission is centered on ensuring Texas leads with Industry 4.0 by supporting broad collaboration with diverse industries, establishing the continuum of capital, and deploying the intelligent infrastructure that enables it. The purpose is to have a unified plan that will accelerate the path to commerce for companies, generate jobs, and support the boom of economic growth within our communities. The coalition will act as a catalyst and will rely heavily on the established organizations and leadership within the state. Programs will be built around; leadership, jobs, economic development, capital, infrastructure, research, and national priorities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-the-future.jpeg
State of the Future
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Athena Partners Strategy Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of the Future
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athena Partners Strategy Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of the Future in 2025.

Incident History — Athena Partners Strategy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athena Partners Strategy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of the Future (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of the Future cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-the-future.jpeg
State of the Future
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Athena Partners Strategy Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State of the Future company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, State of the Future company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Athena Partners Strategy Group company.

In the current year, State of the Future company and Athena Partners Strategy Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State of the Future company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither State of the Future company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither State of the Future company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor State of the Future company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor State of the Future company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Athena Partners Strategy Group company employs more people globally than State of the Future company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor State of the Future holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References