Comparison Overview

Athena Partners Strategy Group

VS

Hodes & Landy

Athena Partners Strategy Group

Anaheim, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Athena’s exclusive focus on parking technology delivers unmatched insight and results, proven by hundreds of success stories from industry leaders who have transformed their operations with our expertise. As a premier technology representation and consultancy, APSG leverages a specialized network of partners to guide organizations in developing new business and launching innovative solutions across parking, transportation, curb management, rideshare, law enforcement, public safety, and EV charging sectors. Learn more at athenapsg.com. We offer over 100 years of combined industry experience in: ✔ Parking and parking enforcement ✔ Transportation and mobility ✔ Curb management and rideshare ✔ Law enforcement and public safety ✔ EV Charging and infrastructure Want to learn more about Athena Partners Strategy Group Representation? Contact us today!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hodes & Landy

284 State Street, Albany, New York, 12210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Hodes & Landy is a full-service government affairs firm, located steps from the New York State Capitol with a proven track record of high quality ethical representation, and exceptional results. Since 1992, Hodes & Landy has employed a unique, hands-on approach to consulting and lobbying. We provide a level of personal service and quality representation that goes far beyond industry standards, believing that every client deserves a customized approach to government relations. We pride ourselves on offering solutions that come from a thorough understanding of our clients'​ positions and goals; achieving the kind of results you only get from a truly committed firm. Our advocacy expertise gives you the advantage. Follow our page for the latest updates regarding legislation and our efforts on behalf of the senior care community.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hodes-&-landy.jpeg
Hodes & Landy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Athena Partners Strategy Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hodes & Landy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athena Partners Strategy Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hodes & Landy in 2025.

Incident History — Athena Partners Strategy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athena Partners Strategy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hodes & Landy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hodes & Landy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hodes-&-landy.jpeg
Hodes & Landy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hodes & Landy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Athena Partners Strategy Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hodes & Landy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Athena Partners Strategy Group company.

In the current year, Hodes & Landy company and Athena Partners Strategy Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hodes & Landy company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hodes & Landy company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hodes & Landy company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor Hodes & Landy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor Hodes & Landy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Athena Partners Strategy Group company and Hodes & Landy company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Hodes & Landy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N