Comparison Overview

Athena Partners Strategy Group

VS

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development

Athena Partners Strategy Group

Anaheim, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Athena’s exclusive focus on parking technology delivers unmatched insight and results, proven by hundreds of success stories from industry leaders who have transformed their operations with our expertise. As a premier technology representation and consultancy, APSG leverages a specialized network of partners to guide organizations in developing new business and launching innovative solutions across parking, transportation, curb management, rideshare, law enforcement, public safety, and EV charging sectors. Learn more at athenapsg.com. We offer over 100 years of combined industry experience in: ✔ Parking and parking enforcement ✔ Transportation and mobility ✔ Curb management and rideshare ✔ Law enforcement and public safety ✔ EV Charging and infrastructure Want to learn more about Athena Partners Strategy Group Representation? Contact us today!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development

18501 Murdock Circle, Port Charlotte, 33948, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Your Business. Cleared for Takeoff. You can feel momentum in the air in Charlotte County, Florida. Things are happening. Just announced: A major partnership with one of America’s premier aviation colleges. Punta Gorda Airport recently completed a multi-million dollar expansion. The economic climate is as sunny as the weather and the landscape looks like a tropical paradise. With a pro-business attitude, leaders willing to invest in the community and fast track approvals, your business can be cleared for takeoff in no time. 4 Reasons Why Charlotte County is a Great Business Location: FAST TRACK APPROVALS TOP FLIGHT LOGISTICS LOWER LAND COSTS QUALITY OF WORK/LIFE View Charlotte County's Social Media Terms of Use at www.CharlotteCountyFL.gov/socialterms.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-county-economic-development-office.jpeg
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Athena Partners Strategy Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athena Partners Strategy Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development in 2025.

Incident History — Athena Partners Strategy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athena Partners Strategy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-county-economic-development-office.jpeg
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Athena Partners Strategy Group company and Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Athena Partners Strategy Group company.

In the current year, Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company and Athena Partners Strategy Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company employs more people globally than Athena Partners Strategy Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N