Comparison Overview

Atessa, Inc.

VS

JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd

Atessa, Inc.

5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 460, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Atessa, Inc., provides Trusted IP with anti-tamper (AT) technology. Our products and services enable system developers to meet AT requirements and address global supply chain security challenges. The proliferation of electronic systems – and the world’s dependence on them to process and store critical information – has enticed the onset of millions of attacks, both in the defense and commercial worlds. By inserting AT technology, system developers can ensure the protection of their vital data and the long-term viability of their system. Whether a military-grade weapons platform, communications device or financial data storage system, integrating AT technology from Atessa will deter exploitation of these critical systems and prevent reverse engineering that would allow adversaries to garner data, transfer information, alter system capabilities, or develop countermeasures. In addition, inserting our solutions will ensure the security of systems throughout the global supply chain. Atessa is a Department of Defense (DoD) Category 1A Trusted Integrated Circuit Supplier for Design Services, accredited by the Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd

1, Jalan Firma 3, Johor Bahru, 81100, MY
Last Update: 2025-11-21

JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd (715017-A) is a fully-owned subsidiary of JCY International Bhd. (713422-X). The parent company is a Malaysian public company listed on Bursa. Its main activities are in the design and manufacture of hard disk drive mechanical components e.g. base plate, top cover assembly, actuator pivot flex assembly and anti-disk. JCY services hard disk drive OEM customers like Western Digital and Seagate.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 502
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atessa-inc..jpeg
Atessa, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcy-hdd-technology-sdn-bhd.jpeg
JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atessa, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atessa, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd in 2025.

Incident History — Atessa, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atessa, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atessa-inc..jpeg
Atessa, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcy-hdd-technology-sdn-bhd.jpeg
JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atessa, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atessa, Inc. company.

In the current year, JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company and Atessa, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company nor Atessa, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company nor Atessa, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company nor Atessa, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atessa, Inc. company nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atessa, Inc. company nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd company employs more people globally than Atessa, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atessa, Inc. nor JCY HDD Technology Sdn Bhd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H