Comparison Overview

ATech Policy Lab

VS

Strong Towns

ATech Policy Lab

7-14 Great Dover Street, None, London, None, GB, SE1 4YR
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The ATech Policy Lab is a new venture from Policy Connect, Bournemouth University and the Ace Centre. It will design public policy so technology works for everyone. The Lab will bring together disabled people, sector leaders and researchers to get into the detail of policy design, incubate new ideas, stress test the best proposals and generate the evidence and insight that moves policymakers to action. This will be done through interactive policy design workshops, targeted policy proposal papers, collaborative research projects and more.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Strong Towns

North America, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Strong Towns is a nationally-recognized non-profit shaping the conversation on growth, development and the future of cities. We support a model of development that allows America’s cities, towns and neighborhoods to grow financially strong and resilient. Our worldwide membership includes individuals and organizations in each U.S. state as well as in Canada, Europe and Australia.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atech-policy-lab.jpeg
ATech Policy Lab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strong-towns.jpeg
Strong Towns
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ATech Policy Lab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Strong Towns
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATech Policy Lab in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strong Towns in 2025.

Incident History — ATech Policy Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATech Policy Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Strong Towns (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strong Towns cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atech-policy-lab.jpeg
ATech Policy Lab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strong-towns.jpeg
Strong Towns
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ATech Policy Lab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Strong Towns company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Strong Towns company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ATech Policy Lab company.

In the current year, Strong Towns company and ATech Policy Lab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Strong Towns company nor ATech Policy Lab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Strong Towns company nor ATech Policy Lab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Strong Towns company nor ATech Policy Lab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ATech Policy Lab company nor Strong Towns company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ATech Policy Lab company nor Strong Towns company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ATech Policy Lab nor Strong Towns holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H