Comparison Overview

At Large Magazine

VS

The Editorial Department

At Large Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

At Large: 2 words that set the new standard for contemporary publishing across multimedia, from printed matter to web-based interface and up-to-the-minute social media. At Large is a first class seat on an irreverent ride through form and content, fact and fiction, investigation and conversation, aesthetics and adventure, becoming without being, anywhere, anytime—it’s a state of mind.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Editorial Department

7650 E. Broadway Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85710, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Editorial Department is one of publishing's oldest authors' services firms with a 44-year track record of helping good manuscripts become great books. We have 13 editors and manuscript consultants on staff along with a talented team of screenplay and adaptation specialists who are all here to help our clients write the best books possible and provide expert support on both traditional and independent paths to publication.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at-large-magazine.jpeg
At Large Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-editorial-department.jpeg
The Editorial Department
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
At Large Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Editorial Department
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for At Large Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Editorial Department in 2025.

Incident History — At Large Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

At Large Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Editorial Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Editorial Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at-large-magazine.jpeg
At Large Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-editorial-department.jpeg
The Editorial Department
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Editorial Department company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to At Large Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Editorial Department company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to At Large Magazine company.

In the current year, The Editorial Department company and At Large Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Editorial Department company nor At Large Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Editorial Department company nor At Large Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Editorial Department company nor At Large Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither At Large Magazine company nor The Editorial Department company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither At Large Magazine company nor The Editorial Department company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Editorial Department company employs more people globally than At Large Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds HIPAA certification.

Neither At Large Magazine nor The Editorial Department holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.