Comparison Overview

KFA Controls

VS

Nitta Corporation of America

KFA Controls

Narabang Way, Belrose, NSW, 2085, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

KFA Controls is an independent programming and control solution company. Our services include consultation, design, programming and supply of control equipment to assist you in providing the complete control solution for your clients technology integration needs. We supply services to and through the following channels: * Commercial audio visual Supplier/Installers * Home Theatre and Smart Home Supplier/Installers * Commercial and Residential Lighting, Supplier/Installers * Home Automation Consultants * Commercial Technology Consultants * Developers, Architects and Builders

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nitta Corporation of America

7605 Nitta Dr Suwanee, Georgia 30024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Nitta Corporation of America supplies leading-edge industrial belting to all industry segments. As the U.S. arm of Japan’s Nitta Corporation, NCA is responsible for serving customers in the Western Hemisphere. Nitta’s worldwide goal is to offer products of unmatched quality and performance so that customers can achieve optimum production, efficiency and lowest operating costs. From its manufacturing facility in Suwanee, Georgia, NCA manufactures the PolyBelt series of flat nylon power transmission belting and Aramid CF finger spliceable power transmission belts. PolySprint finger spliceable power transmission belts, Super Endless power transmission belting and high-tech conveyor belting are manufactured in various plants around the world and stocked and fabricated in Georgia for immediate shipment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at-controls-pty-ltd.jpeg
KFA Controls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nitta-corporation-of-america.jpeg
Nitta Corporation of America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KFA Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nitta Corporation of America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KFA Controls in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nitta Corporation of America in 2025.

Incident History — KFA Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KFA Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nitta Corporation of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nitta Corporation of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at-controls-pty-ltd.jpeg
KFA Controls
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nitta-corporation-of-america.jpeg
Nitta Corporation of America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nitta Corporation of America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KFA Controls company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nitta Corporation of America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KFA Controls company.

In the current year, Nitta Corporation of America company and KFA Controls company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nitta Corporation of America company nor KFA Controls company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nitta Corporation of America company nor KFA Controls company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nitta Corporation of America company nor KFA Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KFA Controls company nor Nitta Corporation of America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KFA Controls company nor Nitta Corporation of America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KFA Controls nor Nitta Corporation of America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H