Comparison Overview

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni

VS

Honeywell

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni

Crawfords Corner Rd, Holmdel, 07748, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Preeminent research and development organization. Inventor of the transistor, the laser, C programming language, UNIX.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Honeywell

Honeywell International Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28202
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Honeywell is a Fortune 500 company that invents and manufactures technologies to address tough challenges linked to global macrotrends such as safety, security, and energy. With approximately 110,000 employees worldwide, including more than 19,000 engineers and scientists, we have an unrelenting focus on quality, delivery, value, and technology in everything we make and do. For additional information on how Honeywell processes your personal information please visit https://www.honeywell.com/privacy-statement.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 127,082
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at&t-bell-laboratories.jpeg
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honeywell.jpeg
Honeywell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Honeywell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni in 2026.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Honeywell in 2026.

Incident History — AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Honeywell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Honeywell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at&t-bell-laboratories.jpeg
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: third-party cloud environment (Snowflake) compromise
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honeywell.jpeg
Honeywell
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Honeywell company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Honeywell company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company.

In the current year, Honeywell company and AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Honeywell company nor AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Honeywell company and AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Honeywell company nor AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Honeywell company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Honeywell company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company.

Honeywell company employs more people globally than AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Honeywell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.