Comparison Overview

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni

VS

Eaton

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni

Crawfords Corner Rd, Holmdel, 07748, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25

Preeminent research and development organization. Inventor of the transistor, the laser, C programming language, UNIX.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Eaton

30 Pembroke Road, Dublin, Ireland, IE, 4
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 800 and 849

Eaton is an intelligent power management company dedicated to improving the quality of life and protecting the environment for people everywhere. We are guided by our commitment to do business right, to operate sustainably and to help our customers manage power ─ today and well into the future. By capitalizing on the global growth trends of electrification and digitalization, we’re accelerating the planet’s transition to renewable energy and helping to solve the world’s most urgent power management challenges. Eaton is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Eaton is committed to ensuring equal employment opportunities for all job applicants and employees. Employment decisions are based upon job-related reasons regardless of an applicant's race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, national origin, disability, marital status, genetic information, protected veteran status, or any other status protected by law.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 54,482
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at&t-bell-laboratories.jpeg
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eaton.jpeg
Eaton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eaton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni in 2026.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eaton in 2026.

Incident History — AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eaton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eaton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at&t-bell-laboratories.jpeg
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: third-party cloud environment (Snowflake) compromise
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eaton.jpeg
Eaton
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eaton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Eaton company has not reported any.

In the current year, Eaton company and AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eaton company nor AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Eaton company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Eaton company nor AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company nor Eaton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Eaton company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company.

Eaton company employs more people globally than AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Eaton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N