Comparison Overview

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni

VS

Foxconn

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni

Crawfords Corner Rd, Holmdel, 07748, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25

Preeminent research and development organization. Inventor of the transistor, the laser, C programming language, UNIX.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Foxconn

US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integrate its unique manufacturing systems with emerging technologies. By capitalizing on its expertise in Cloud Computing, Mobile Devices, IoT, Big Data, AI, Smart Networks, and Robotics / Automation, the Group has expanded not only its capabilities into the development of electric vehicles, digital health and robotics, but also three key technologies –AI, semiconductors and new-generation communications technology – which are key to driving its long-term growth strategy and the four core product pillars: Consumer Products, Enterprise Products, Computing Products and Components and Others. In 2021, Hon Hai's annual revenue reached NT$5.99 trillion. The company has established R&D and manufacturing centers in other markets around the world including China, India, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Czech Republic, U.S. and more. With a focus on research and development, the company owns more than 54,253 patents. In addition to maximizing value-creation for customers who include many of the world’s leading technology companies, Foxconn is also dedicated to championing environmental sustainability in the manufacturing process and serving as a best-practices model for global enterprises. The company has received widespread international accolades and recognition since its establishment. The company ranked 22nd on the Fortune Global 500 rankings in 2021 and 25th in the Top 100 Digital Companies in the Forbes ranking of the World’s Best Employers in 2019. Moreover, on Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2021 rankings, the company ranked 1st in Taiwan. Foxconn is also the only Taiwanese ​private company awarded for 5 consecutive years of Clarivate Top 100 Global Innovators (2018 - 2022).

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 96,074
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at&t-bell-laboratories.jpeg
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxconn.jpeg
Foxconn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foxconn
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni in 2026.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foxconn in 2026.

Incident History — AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/at&t-bell-laboratories.jpeg
AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: third-party cloud environment (Snowflake) compromise
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxconn.jpeg
Foxconn
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: espionage, financial gain, disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Foxconn company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Foxconn company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company.

In the current year, Foxconn company and AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Foxconn company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Foxconn company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Foxconn company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company nor Foxconn company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Foxconn company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company.

Foxconn company employs more people globally than AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AT&T Bell Laboratories Alumni nor Foxconn holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N