Comparison Overview

AstraZeneca

VS

EMS

AstraZeneca

1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

We're transforming the future of healthcare by unlocking the power of what science can do for people, society and the planet. For more information, visit www.astrazeneca.com. Community Guidelines: bit.ly/2MgAcio

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 76,382
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

EMS

Rodovia Jorn. Francisco Aguirre Proenca, Hortolandia, SP, 13186-525, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

EMS is the leading pharmaceutical company in Brazil. Established since 45 years and with 100% national capital, the company has two industrial plants strategically placed in São Bernardo do Campo and Hortolândia, in the state of São Paulo. With a work based on daring, simplicity, excellence and responsibility, the company reached the top of the ranking, but not by chance. The strength of the brand belongs on the constant investments in structure and research, in the continuous expansion of the products line and in the pioneer attitude. As the first Brazilian laboratory to export medicine products to Europe and to produce, in the country, medicine products in fractioned packing and generics, EMS is definitively reinventing the pharmaceutical market.

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 12,325
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/astrazeneca.jpeg
AstraZeneca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ems.jpeg
EMS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AstraZeneca
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EMS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AstraZeneca in 2025.

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EMS in 2025.

Incident History — AstraZeneca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AstraZeneca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EMS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/astrazeneca.jpeg
AstraZeneca
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exposed Credentials
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ems.jpeg
EMS
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AstraZeneca company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EMS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AstraZeneca and EMS have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, EMS company and AstraZeneca company have not reported any cyber incidents.

EMS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AstraZeneca company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AstraZeneca company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other EMS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EMS company nor AstraZeneca company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AstraZeneca company nor EMS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AstraZeneca company nor EMS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AstraZeneca company employs more people globally than EMS company, reflecting its scale as a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AstraZeneca nor EMS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H