Comparison Overview

Astraea Press

VS

Hopkins Press

Astraea Press

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.astraeapress.com

Astraea was formed in 2010 when two friends saw the need for a non-erotic e-publisher that offers wholesome reads but still maintains the quality of mainstream romance. With over six years experience in the publishing industry and avid readers, owners Stephanie looks forward to working with their authors, having fun, and bringing you the best books available.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hopkins Press

2715 North Charles Street, None, Baltimore, MD, US, 21218
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.press.jhu.edu

At Hopkins Press, we envision a future where knowledge enriches the life of every person. America’s oldest university press was established at the nation’s first research university in 1878. Ever since, Johns Hopkins University Press has shared the benefits of discovery with the world. With a portfolio of four interconnected publishing businesses, Hopkins Press provides global access, impact, and influence for the scholarship that we publish and distribute. We select and develop innovative ideas and research; we employ groundbreaking technologies to enhance discovery and learning; we connect a global audience of readers to trusted knowledge from leading researchers, scholars, and educators. We do all this under the imprint of Johns Hopkins University Press and in the name of our University’s distinguished faculty and institutions.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 100
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/astraea-press.jpeg
Astraea Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopkins-press.jpeg
Hopkins Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Astraea Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hopkins Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Astraea Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hopkins Press in 2025.

Incident History — Astraea Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Astraea Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hopkins Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hopkins Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/astraea-press.jpeg
Astraea Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopkins-press.jpeg
Hopkins Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Astraea Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hopkins Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hopkins Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Astraea Press company.

In the current year, Hopkins Press company and Astraea Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hopkins Press company nor Astraea Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hopkins Press company nor Astraea Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hopkins Press company nor Astraea Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Astraea Press company nor Hopkins Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Astraea Press company nor Hopkins Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hopkins Press company employs more people globally than Astraea Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Astraea Press nor Hopkins Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References