Comparison Overview

Anthony S. Torres Photography

VS

Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography

Anthony S. Torres Photography

106 W Horton St, Suite 3, Zebulon, North Carolina, US, 27597
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Since 2003, my focus has been on photography, and I continue to study and learn as much as I can to get even better at my craft. My goal is to capture those special moments of your family and chidren growing up: their birth announcements, their 1st birthdays, sweet 16s, all the way through to engagements and marriage and beyond. Candid moments, fashion shows, landscape & architecture are all part of my range of subjects. When it comes to my overall style, I am a big fan of the photojournalistic style and having subjects unaware I am photographing them. If you'd like to find me on most social media sites, my username is typically "astphotos"​, thanks.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography

1173 Warner Ave, Tustin, California, 92780, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Wedding Photographers and Videographers in Los Angeles and Orange County, California specializing in capturing emotional moments with creativity. Our style combines photojournalism with fashion and landscape photography to create stunning imagery. We also specialize in advanced post production and advanced lighting techniques. We serve all of southern California.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/astphotos.jpeg
Anthony S. Torres Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lin-and-jirsa-wedding-photography.jpeg
Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anthony S. Torres Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anthony S. Torres Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Anthony S. Torres Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anthony S. Torres Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/astphotos.jpeg
Anthony S. Torres Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lin-and-jirsa-wedding-photography.jpeg
Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anthony S. Torres Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anthony S. Torres Photography company.

In the current year, Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company and Anthony S. Torres Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company nor Anthony S. Torres Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company nor Anthony S. Torres Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company nor Anthony S. Torres Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography company nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography company nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography company employs more people globally than Anthony S. Torres Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anthony S. Torres Photography nor Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N