Comparison Overview

Assurance Maladie

VS

City of Los Angeles

Assurance Maladie

Last Update: 2025-12-19

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est donner une nouvelle dimension à votre métier et agir au quotidien pour la protection de notre système de santé. Participez à une grande diversité de projets dans un cadre bienveillant et soyez fier de contribuer à une mission essentielle : agir ensemble, protéger chacun. Depuis près de 80 ans, l'Assurance Maladie joue un rôle majeur au service de la solidarité nationale. Nous sommes convaincus que la clé de la pérennité du système de santé relève d'une responsabilité collective et réside dans l'implication forte de chacun de ses acteurs. Au sein de ce système, l'Assurance Maladie assume une triple mission : ⏺️ garantir un accès universel aux droits et permettre l'accès aux soins ⏺️ accompagner chacun dans la préservation de sa santé ⏺️ améliorer l'efficacité du système Toutes ses missions, l’Assurance Maladie les mène avec le souci d’assurer la meilleure qualité de service. Elle s’appuie pour cela sur un réseau de proximité qui couvre l’ensemble du territoire et l’engagement de plus de 80 000 collaborateurs qui agissent jour après jour à l’échelle départementale, régionale et nationale. Ensemble, au quotidien, ils font vivre ses valeurs d’universalité, de solidarité, de responsabilité et d’innovation.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 23,361
Subsidiaries: 102
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

City of Los Angeles

200 North Spring St., Los Angeles, California, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Council-Commission form of government, as originally adopted by voters of the City of Los Angeles, effective July 1, 1925, and reaffirmed by a new Charter effective July 1, 2000. A Mayor, City Controller, and City Attorney are elected by City residents every four years. Fifteen City Council members representing fifteen districts are elected by the people for four-year terms, for a maximum of two terms. Members of Commissions are generally appointed by the Mayor, subject to the approval of the City Council. General Managers of the various City departments are also appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Most employees of the City are subject to the civil service provisions of the City Charter.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 15,569
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assurance-maladie.jpeg
Assurance Maladie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Assurance Maladie
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Los Angeles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurance Maladie in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Los Angeles in 2025.

Incident History — Assurance Maladie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurance Maladie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assurance-maladie.jpeg
Assurance Maladie
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Los Angeles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Assurance Maladie company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Assurance Maladie company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Los Angeles company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Los Angeles company and Assurance Maladie company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor Assurance Maladie company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Assurance Maladie company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor Assurance Maladie company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Assurance Maladie company nor City of Los Angeles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Assurance Maladie company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Los Angeles company.

Assurance Maladie company employs more people globally than City of Los Angeles company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Assurance Maladie nor City of Los Angeles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N