Comparison Overview

Association of Washington Cities

VS

The Tatman Group

Association of Washington Cities

1076 Franklin St. SE, Olympia, 98501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://wacities.org

The Association of Washington Cities (AWC) is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan corporation that represents all 281 Washington's cities and towns before the state legislature, the state executive branch and with regulatory agencies. AWC is a highly respected voice before the Legislature, Congress, government agencies and others and is a catalyst for developing a broad public understanding of the important roles of cities and towns across the state. AWC social media is not a public forum. By accessing or engaging on AWC’s social media sites, you accept and agree to be bound by these Terms. https://wacities.org/terms-of-use

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Tatman Group

609 Lakeland Dr, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70802, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tatmangroup.com/

The Tatman Group is a full-service Government Relations firm, established in 1997. We have extensive experience and training in government relations. Our experience is backed by memberships in both the Louisiana Society of Association Executives and the Association of Louisiana Lobbyists. ​ Our team of experienced, highly-trained professionals offers more than 30 years of combined government relations. At The Tatman Group, we don't look for contracts, we seek to build long-lasting relationships. We are client-focused and solution-driven.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-of-washington-cities.jpeg
Association of Washington Cities
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-tatman-group.jpeg
The Tatman Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association of Washington Cities
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Tatman Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association of Washington Cities in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Tatman Group in 2025.

Incident History — Association of Washington Cities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association of Washington Cities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Tatman Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Tatman Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-of-washington-cities.jpeg
Association of Washington Cities
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-tatman-group.jpeg
The Tatman Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Association of Washington Cities company and The Tatman Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Tatman Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Association of Washington Cities company.

In the current year, The Tatman Group company and Association of Washington Cities company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Tatman Group company nor Association of Washington Cities company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Tatman Group company nor Association of Washington Cities company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Tatman Group company nor Association of Washington Cities company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Association of Washington Cities company nor The Tatman Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Tatman Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Association of Washington Cities company.

Association of Washington Cities company employs more people globally than The Tatman Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association of Washington Cities nor The Tatman Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References