Comparison Overview

Association of the United States Navy

VS

ISACA

Association of the United States Navy

3337 Duke St., Alexandria, 22314, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Association of the United States Navy strives to advance the interests of the U.S. Navy and protect the rights and benefits of its Sailors. AUSN members include active and reserve officers, enlisted and civilian civilians, serving, veteran, and retired sailors, and their families. Today, AUSN is the leading voice for America’s Sailors, a strong supporter of American naval power, a leading provider of professional career development, and the most prominent advocacy association for the Navy and current and former Sailors.

NAICS: 81391
NAICS Definition: Business Associations
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ISACA

1700 E Golf Rd, Schaumburg, Illinois, 60173, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ISACA® (www.isaca.org) represents the global workforce advancing trust in technology. For more than 55 years, ISACA has empowered its global community of 185,000+ members with the knowledge, credentials, training and network they need to thrive in fields like information security, governance, assurance, data privacy, risk management and emerging tech. With a presence in 195 countries and with nearly 230 chapters worldwide, ISACA offers resources tailored to every stage of members’ careers—helping them to thrive in a rapidly changing digital landscape, drive trusted innovation and ensure a more secure digital world. Through the ISACA Foundation, ISACA also champions IT education and career pathways for underrepresented and underresourced communities, fostering a diverse and inclusive technology workforce.

NAICS: 81391
NAICS Definition: Business Associations
Employees: 1,225
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/isaca.jpeg
ISACA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association of the United States Navy
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ISACA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industry Associations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association of the United States Navy in 2025.

Incidents vs Industry Associations Industry Average (This Year)

ISACA has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Association of the United States Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association of the United States Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ISACA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ISACA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-of-the-us-navy.jpeg
Association of the United States Navy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/isaca.jpeg
ISACA
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Harvest now, decrypt later
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Association of the United States Navy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ISACA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ISACA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Association of the United States Navy company has not reported any.

In the current year, ISACA company has reported more cyber incidents than Association of the United States Navy company.

Neither ISACA company nor Association of the United States Navy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ISACA company nor Association of the United States Navy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

ISACA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Association of the United States Navy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Association of the United States Navy company nor ISACA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Association of the United States Navy company nor ISACA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ISACA company employs more people globally than Association of the United States Navy company, reflecting its scale as a Industry Associations.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association of the United States Navy nor ISACA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.