Comparison Overview

Association for PRINT Technologies

VS

Command Web

Association for PRINT Technologies

450 10th Circle N , None, Nashville, TN, US, 37203
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://PrintTechnologies.org

APTech is a member-driven association that along with its independent subsidiary, WhatTheyThink, is a premier source of print industry news and analysis; media production; specialty events; and educational content on all facets of today’s print industry. APTech is ANSI-accredited to support national and international standards development for the print industry, including ICC, B65, CGATS and USTAG. For complete information about the Association, its programs, and its member companies, visit: https://PrintTechnologies.org or phone: 703/264-7200.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Command Web

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://[email protected]

The Command Web Group of companies is privately held with more than 35 years of manufacturing experience. Through five facilities, Command Web Offset, Command Web Missouri, Command Financial, Bind-Rite Robbinsville, and SCI we provide print media solutions for book publishers, educational publishers, financial services companies, the healthcare and manufacturing industries. A national leader in the book manufacturing industry. Ranked in the Top 45 Largest Printers in the United States. Manufacturing over 1.5 Million books a day. 650,000 Square Feet of Manufacturing One of the nation’s largest privately held print organizations. More than 70 year’s experience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-print-technologies.jpeg
Association for PRINT Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/command-web.jpeg
Command Web
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association for PRINT Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Command Web
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association for PRINT Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Command Web in 2025.

Incident History — Association for PRINT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association for PRINT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Command Web (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Command Web cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-print-technologies.jpeg
Association for PRINT Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/command-web.jpeg
Command Web
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Command Web company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Association for PRINT Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Command Web company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Association for PRINT Technologies company.

In the current year, Command Web company and Association for PRINT Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Command Web company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Command Web company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Command Web company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Command Web company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Command Web company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Command Web company employs more people globally than Association for PRINT Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies nor Command Web holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References