Comparison Overview

Association for Behavioral Healthcare

VS

Public Affairs Council

Association for Behavioral Healthcare

1661 Worcester Rd, Framingham, 01701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

For over 40 years, the Association for Behavioral Healthcare (ABH) has been the leading advocacy organization in Massachusetts’ mental health and addiction services arena. Fighting for high-quality, community-based care for families and individuals with mental illness, addiction and substance-use disorders, ABH provides leadership and statewide coordination on important public policy, financing, preferred clinical models and quality assurance issues. ABH is a statewide association representing over eighty community-based mental health and addiction treatment provider organizations. Our members are the primary providers of publicly-funded behavioral healthcare services in the Commonwealth, serving approximately 81,000 Massachusetts residents daily and over three-quarters of a million residents annually, and employing 37,500 people. ABH represents its member providers to funding, legislative and regulatory agencies at the state and national levels and has become a powerful and compelling advocacy organization to ensure that citizens throughout the Commonwealth have access to quality, comprehensive community-based care. ABH identifies and impacts emerging issues relating to mental health and addiction treatment services.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Public Affairs Council

2121 K St. N.W., Suite 900, Washington, DC, US, 20037
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Public Affairs Council is the leading nonpartisan, nonpolitical association for public affairs professionals worldwide. Launched in 1954, our mission is to advance the field of public affairs and to provide members with the executive education and expertise they need to succeed while maintaining the highest ethical standards. The Council’s staff professionals have direct experience in corporate and association public affairs management, lobbying, global public affairs, social media, corporate responsibility, campaign finance, grassroots advocacy, crisis communication and a host of related areas. Welcome to the Council’s LinkedIn page. While we encourage discussion on our social media sites, we wish to keep the conversation civil and professional. Please note that comments posted on this site do not reflect the opinion of the Council or its staff. By participating in this page, you agree that you will abide by applicable online laws, and acknowledge that the Council’s original content and intellectual property are protected under copyright laws. In addition, the following will usually be deleted: -Offensive, defamatory, inaccurate, unprofessional or irrelevant language. -Personal attacks about people or organizations. -Promotional posts and spam messages. -Personal information about others such as home addresses.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Association for Behavioral Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-affairs-council.jpeg
Public Affairs Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association for Behavioral Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Affairs Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association for Behavioral Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Affairs Council in 2025.

Incident History — Association for Behavioral Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association for Behavioral Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Affairs Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Affairs Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Association for Behavioral Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-affairs-council.jpeg
Public Affairs Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Affairs Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Association for Behavioral Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public Affairs Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Association for Behavioral Healthcare company.

In the current year, Public Affairs Council company and Association for Behavioral Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Affairs Council company nor Association for Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Affairs Council company nor Association for Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Affairs Council company nor Association for Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare company nor Public Affairs Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare company nor Public Affairs Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public Affairs Council company employs more people globally than Association for Behavioral Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association for Behavioral Healthcare nor Public Affairs Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H