Comparison Overview

Associated Labels & Packaging

VS

Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark

Associated Labels & Packaging

61 Clipper Street, Coquitlam, BC, V3K 6X2, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.associatedlp.com

Associated Labels and Packaging is a dynamic, family-owned company located in Vancouver, Canada. We create premium-quality packaging on-site that aligns with the diverse needs of our ever-widening circle of global customers. With 40 years of experience, we're well-versed in many industries: food, beverage, sports nutrition, beauty & personal care, and agriculture and produce to name a few. We pride ourselves on delivering perfect packaging solutions, no matter the ask, and are always up for a challenge. We are committed to sustainable innovation, which led to our being the first to combine recyclable or 100% compostable food-safe lidding film with a 100% Compostable Tray. We also source our films, adhesives, and substrates from local suppliers to improve timing, reliability and reduce our carbon footprint.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark

601 Dover Road, Rockville, MD, 20850, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spectrumprinting.com

Spectrum Printing & Graphics is a full service commercial printing organization that provides a unique combination of fully integrated communication solutions. Spectrum offers offset and digital printing, project management, graphic design, digital prepress, signage, promotional products, mailing and fulfillment. We strive to provide the right balance of personal attention, technical integration and know-how. Our detailed approach to the entire production and distribution process of printed materials has enabled our clients to realize their objectives, and to meet their deadlines in a cost-effective and timely manner. Please contact us and let us show you how we can help you and your organization achieve your goals and to communicate more effectively and cost efficiently with your desired audience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/associatedlp.jpeg
Associated Labels & Packaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spectrum-printing-&-graphics.jpeg
Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Associated Labels & Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Associated Labels & Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark in 2025.

Incident History — Associated Labels & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Associated Labels & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/associatedlp.jpeg
Associated Labels & Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spectrum-printing-&-graphics.jpeg
Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Associated Labels & Packaging company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Associated Labels & Packaging company.

In the current year, Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company and Associated Labels & Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company nor Associated Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company nor Associated Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company nor Associated Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging company nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging company nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Associated Labels & Packaging company employs more people globally than Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Spectrum Printing & Graphics/ Ironmark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References