Comparison Overview

Associated Labels & Packaging

VS

Conlin's Print

Associated Labels & Packaging

61 Clipper Street, Coquitlam, BC, V3K 6X2, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.associatedlp.com

Associated Labels and Packaging is a dynamic, family-owned company located in Vancouver, Canada. We create premium-quality packaging on-site that aligns with the diverse needs of our ever-widening circle of global customers. With 40 years of experience, we're well-versed in many industries: food, beverage, sports nutrition, beauty & personal care, and agriculture and produce to name a few. We pride ourselves on delivering perfect packaging solutions, no matter the ask, and are always up for a challenge. We are committed to sustainable innovation, which led to our being the first to combine recyclable or 100% compostable food-safe lidding film with a 100% Compostable Tray. We also source our films, adhesives, and substrates from local suppliers to improve timing, reliability and reduce our carbon footprint.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Conlin's Print

1011 West Eighth Ave, King of Prussia, Pa, US, 19406
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conlinsprint.com

At Conlin’s Print, we have offered a personal approach to printing since we first opened our family business in 1980. The core values of quality and efficiency put in place by Mike and Jane Conlin remain the foundation today for our successful partnership with our many clients. With dedicated employees running shifts in King of Prussia using the latest print technology, Conlin’s prides itself on meeting today’s demands for quality and service. We are FSC Chain of Custody certified, which supports responsible management of the world’s forests and ensures that we are to do our part for generations to come by running our business with renewable resources.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/associatedlp.jpeg
Associated Labels & Packaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conlins-print.jpeg
Conlin's Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Associated Labels & Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conlin's Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Associated Labels & Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conlin's Print in 2025.

Incident History — Associated Labels & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Associated Labels & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conlin's Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conlin's Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/associatedlp.jpeg
Associated Labels & Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conlins-print.jpeg
Conlin's Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Associated Labels & Packaging company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conlin's Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Conlin's Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Associated Labels & Packaging company.

In the current year, Conlin's Print company and Associated Labels & Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conlin's Print company nor Associated Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conlin's Print company nor Associated Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conlin's Print company nor Associated Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging company nor Conlin's Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging company nor Conlin's Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Associated Labels & Packaging company employs more people globally than Conlin's Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Associated Labels & Packaging nor Conlin's Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References