Comparison Overview

Associated Clinic of Psychology

VS

The Renfrew Center

Associated Clinic of Psychology

4027 County Road 25, Minneapolis, 55416, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Associated Clinic of Psychology is a premier full-service, multi-specialty behavioral health provider group that offers services to adults, children, & families. ACP is committed to being the provider and employer of choice for behavioral health care services in the Twin Cities Metro. Our experienced providers and caring staff equip people with the tools needed to live their best life through a variety of behavioral health care services in multiple settings. Through convenient locations, extended hours, and a diverse range of available services, ACP eliminates barriers to seeking and receiving behavioral health care services. Founded in 1980 by John Brose, Ph.D., LP, ACP is committed to providing quality behavioral health care, pursuing innovation, and obtaining client satisfaction.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 211
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Renfrew Center

475 Spring Ln, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Renfrew Center has been the pioneer in the treatment of eating disorders since 1985. As the nation’s first residential eating disorder facility, now with 19 locations throughout the country, Renfrew has helped more than 100,000 cisgender adolescent girls and adult women, transgender, and non-binary individuals move towards recovery. Renfrew provides those suffering from anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and related mental health problems with the tools they need to succeed in recovery and in life. Renfrew’s extensive range of services include residential, day treatment, intensive outpatient, outpatient, and virtual services. Each treatment level is built upon The Renfrew Center Unified Treatment Model for Eating Disorders®, an evidence-based, emotion-focused therapy that addresses eating disorders and co-morbid symptoms. Within this model, individual and group therapy are enhanced with a diverse array of services to meet patients’ needs. Renfrew accepts most major insurances and is a preferred provider for all levels of treatment. Call 1-800-RENFREW (736-3739) or visit www.renfrewcenter.com for more information about The Renfrew Centers.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 435
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/associated-clinic-of-psychology.jpeg
Associated Clinic of Psychology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-renfrew-center.jpeg
The Renfrew Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Associated Clinic of Psychology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Renfrew Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Associated Clinic of Psychology in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Renfrew Center in 2026.

Incident History — Associated Clinic of Psychology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Associated Clinic of Psychology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Renfrew Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Renfrew Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/associated-clinic-of-psychology.jpeg
Associated Clinic of Psychology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-renfrew-center.jpeg
The Renfrew Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Renfrew Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Associated Clinic of Psychology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Renfrew Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Associated Clinic of Psychology company.

In the current year, The Renfrew Center company and Associated Clinic of Psychology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Renfrew Center company nor Associated Clinic of Psychology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Renfrew Center company nor Associated Clinic of Psychology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Renfrew Center company nor Associated Clinic of Psychology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology company nor The Renfrew Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology company nor The Renfrew Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Renfrew Center company employs more people globally than Associated Clinic of Psychology company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Associated Clinic of Psychology nor The Renfrew Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N