Comparison Overview

ASSABET Technology

VS

Ceptagon

ASSABET Technology

100 Powder Mill, Acton, MA, 01720, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Assabet Technology is focused on helping customers make intelligent decisions around their choice of high performance solutions for the Data Center, Media and Entertainment and Video surveillance markets. We design and manufacture purpose-built appliances and solutions that enable our customer to maximize their time and talents doing what they do best without worrying about how to create the computer infrastructures to do it ... because that's what we do. With customers and installations worldwide, Assabet Technology has been providing solutions for more than a decade.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ceptagon

Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Designed, Engineered, & Manufactured in the United States of America. How many computer case manufacturers can say that? We do! ​Solutions for everyday desktop computer problems are coming your way from Ceptagon. We ensure our products are designed to the highest standards using our prior experience from designing high amperage industrial electrical equipment and electrical enclosures. We are devoted to manufacturing better products using advanced technologies, materials, and processes. Our manufacturing partners have a combined 40+ years of manufacturing experience. ​Innovation begins with an idea. This idea came from how we wanted to use our computers in 2008. Now it is 2018, and no one has touched the idea. It is time to create the world of PC's we want to live in.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assabet-technology.jpeg
ASSABET Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceptagon.jpeg
Ceptagon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ASSABET Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ceptagon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASSABET Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ceptagon in 2025.

Incident History — ASSABET Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASSABET Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ceptagon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ceptagon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assabet-technology.jpeg
ASSABET Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceptagon.jpeg
Ceptagon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ceptagon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ASSABET Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ceptagon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ASSABET Technology company.

In the current year, Ceptagon company and ASSABET Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ceptagon company nor ASSABET Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ceptagon company nor ASSABET Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ceptagon company nor ASSABET Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ASSABET Technology company nor Ceptagon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ASSABET Technology company nor Ceptagon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ASSABET Technology company employs more people globally than Ceptagon company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ASSABET Technology nor Ceptagon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H