Comparison Overview

ASRC Federal

VS

Atos

ASRC Federal

11091 Sunset Hills Rd, Suite 800, Reston, VA, US, 20190
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asrcfederal.com

ASRC Federal’s employees provide solutions for more than 30 U.S. federal defense and civilian agencies. We deliver leading-edge technology and deep expertise to a wide range of critical national missions -- from space exploration to cyber defense to public health. Our work helps secure an enduring future for over 14,000 Iñupiat shareholders from Alaska’s North Slope. Our people bring innovation to every mission -- like assembling the Orion spacecraft that will take astronauts back to the Moon, pioneering cloud computing and cybersecurity for federal agencies, ensuring safer air travel and helping maintain U.S. military bases so our heroes can focus on protecting the nation. We have expertise in IT modernization, software applications and analytics, engineering solutions, critical infrastructure and base operations, professional services and supply chain management and logistics. ASRC Federal is a certified Great Place to Work™, Military Times’ ‘Best for Vets’ and received the VETS Indexes 5-Star Employer Rating. Please visit www.asrcfederal.com/careers to learn more about your next great career opportunity!

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 4,966
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Atos

80 Quai Voltaire, 95877 Bezons, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.atos.net

Atos Group is a global leader in digital transformation with c. 70,000 employees and annual revenue of c. € 10 billion, operating in 67 countries under two brands — Atos for services and Eviden for products. European number one in cybersecurity, cloud and high-performance computing, Atos Group is committed to a secure and decarbonized future and provides tailored AI-powered, end-to-end solutions for all industries. Atos is a SE (Societas Europaea) and listed on Euronext Paris. The purpose of Atos is to help design the future of the information space. Its expertise and services support the development of knowledge, education and research in a multicultural approach and contribute to the development of scientific and technological excellence. Across the world, the Group enables its customers and employees, and members of societies at large to live, work and develop sustainably, in a safe and secure information space.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 77,740
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asrc-federal.jpeg
ASRC Federal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atos.jpeg
Atos
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ASRC Federal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atos
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

ASRC Federal has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atos in 2025.

Incident History — ASRC Federal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASRC Federal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asrc-federal.jpeg
ASRC Federal
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Infrastructure Compromise, Phishing/Spoofing, Unpatched Vulnerabilities
Motivation: Intelligence Collection, Operational Disruption, Financial Gain, Exploitation of Coordination Gaps
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atos.jpeg
Atos
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atos company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ASRC Federal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ASRC Federal company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Atos company has not reported any.

In the current year, ASRC Federal company has reported more cyber incidents than Atos company.

Neither Atos company nor ASRC Federal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atos company nor ASRC Federal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

ASRC Federal company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Atos company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ASRC Federal company nor Atos company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Atos company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ASRC Federal company.

Atos company employs more people globally than ASRC Federal company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ASRC Federal nor Atos holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References