Comparison Overview

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County

VS

NAMI Miami-Dade

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County

16220 Frederick Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20877, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

We are a private mental health practice offering individual, family, couples, and group therapy for children (birth -12,) adolescents (13 –17), adults (18 - 65) and seniors (66+). Our therapy staff consists of over 30 experienced, licensed Clinical Social Workers, Professional Counselors, Psychologists of diverse nationalities, languages and ages. Our main oiffice is based in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Our therapists help you cope with stress, grief, anxiety, depression, phobias, adoption, divorce, aging, and other life challenges. Outside the office we run specialized community based programs for high-risk, uninsured or underinsured children, adults, and families within Montgomery County. These program specialize in pre-natal and post-partum depression, aging, integrated behavioral health and support groups for young adults with multiple sclerosis, and parents of children with disabilities.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NAMI Miami-Dade

undefined, Coral Gables, FL, 33134, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The National Alliance on Mental Illness of Miami-Dade County is an affiliate of the nation’s largest grassroots mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for the millions of Americans affected by mental illness. Approximately 1 in 5 Americans will experience a mental illness in a given year, yet only 41% will receive the mental health services they need and deserve. In advocating for the understanding of the complexity of mental health and expelling myths, educating the public, and showing support for the many people affected by mental illness that are working to improve their lives, NAMI Miami-Dade County offers free, safe, and confidential mental health support, education, and advocacy to peers and their families and friends throughout the county in both English and Spanish. For more information, visit NAMIMiami.org and connect with us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Meetup at @NAMIMiami.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspire-counseling-montgomery-county.jpeg
Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/namimiami.jpeg
NAMI Miami-Dade
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAMI Miami-Dade
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAMI Miami-Dade in 2026.

Incident History — Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAMI Miami-Dade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAMI Miami-Dade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspire-counseling-montgomery-county.jpeg
Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/namimiami.jpeg
NAMI Miami-Dade
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAMI Miami-Dade company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NAMI Miami-Dade company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company.

In the current year, NAMI Miami-Dade company and Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NAMI Miami-Dade company nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NAMI Miami-Dade company nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NAMI Miami-Dade company nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company nor NAMI Miami-Dade company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company nor NAMI Miami-Dade company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NAMI Miami-Dade company employs more people globally than Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County nor NAMI Miami-Dade holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H