Comparison Overview

Aspen Publishing

VS

A Magazine (Kent State)

Aspen Publishing

None, None, Boston, MA, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aspenpublishing.com

Aspen Publishing is the leading provider of educational content and digital learning solutions to law schools in the U.S. and around the world. Providing best-in-class solutions for legal education through authoritative textbooks written by renowned authors; breakthrough products, like Connected Casebook; and strategic partnerships with companies like NITA.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

A Magazine (Kent State)

800 E. Summit St., Kent, OH, 44240, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://theamag.com

A Magazine is a student-run fashion magazine at Kent State University. It provides its readers with the latest in fashion, beauty and culture. In an industry that’s always changing, we want you to always be in the know. Whether it’s a new beauty product, stylish campus looks, or that accessory you can’t live without, we have it here for you.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenpublishing.jpeg
Aspen Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-magazine-kent-state-.jpeg
A Magazine (Kent State)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspen Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A Magazine (Kent State)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Magazine (Kent State) in 2025.

Incident History — Aspen Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A Magazine (Kent State) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Magazine (Kent State) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenpublishing.jpeg
Aspen Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-magazine-kent-state-.jpeg
A Magazine (Kent State)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A Magazine (Kent State) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspen Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A Magazine (Kent State) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspen Publishing company.

In the current year, A Magazine (Kent State) company and Aspen Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A Magazine (Kent State) company nor Aspen Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A Magazine (Kent State) company nor Aspen Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A Magazine (Kent State) company nor Aspen Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspen Publishing company nor A Magazine (Kent State) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspen Publishing company nor A Magazine (Kent State) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aspen Publishing company employs more people globally than A Magazine (Kent State) company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspen Publishing nor A Magazine (Kent State) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References