Comparison Overview

Aspenprint

VS

Danker Print Solutions, Inc.

Aspenprint

262 Ringwood Road, Poole, England, BH14 0RS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We are the UK's leading provider of design and print for the hospitality industry. Over the past 50 years the team at Aspenprint have helped over 2,500 hotels, restaurants and other businesses within the hospitality industry to market themselves through creative design and print. From larger hotel brands such as Hilton, Best Western, Crowne Plaza, Mercure, Marriott and Holiday Inn to smaller boutique hotels, restaurants and independent businesses across the UK and Channel Islands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Danker Print Solutions, Inc.

800 Progress Industrial Blvd., Lawrenceville, GA, 30043, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Over 30 Years of Experience Since 1978 Danker has manufactured Quality Graphic Products for all types of Industrial and Commercial Imaging applications. We excel in providing front end technical expertise and custom tailored services throughout the order process. Our modern facility is set up with the latest and most efficient equipment and staffed with experienced, well trained employees. What We Do Best From conception thru final delivery, we will work with you to turn your graphic ideas into visual realities. Our primary goal is 100% Customer satisfaction. Our commitment to you is to always provide ON TIME DELIVERY and QUALITY GRAPHIC PRODUCTS. We listen to our Customers and we strive to exceed expectations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenprint-poole.jpeg
Aspenprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danker-print-solutions-inc-.jpeg
Danker Print Solutions, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspenprint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danker Print Solutions, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspenprint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danker Print Solutions, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Aspenprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspenprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danker Print Solutions, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danker Print Solutions, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenprint-poole.jpeg
Aspenprint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danker-print-solutions-inc-.jpeg
Danker Print Solutions, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspenprint company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspenprint company.

In the current year, Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company and Aspenprint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company nor Aspenprint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company nor Aspenprint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company nor Aspenprint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspenprint company nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspenprint company nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aspenprint company employs more people globally than Danker Print Solutions, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspenprint nor Danker Print Solutions, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N