Comparison Overview

Aspenhome

VS

Plymouth Furniture

Aspenhome

601 N. 75th Ave., Phoenix, AZ, US, 85043
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aspenhome.net

Since its inception, aspenhome has expanded from a domestic manufacturer in Phoenix, Arizona, to a global distributor of thoughtfully designed furniture for all rooms of the home. aspenhome creates thoughtfully designed furniture that is fashionable, functional and fun, and responds to the way people work, play and relax at home.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Plymouth Furniture

2133 Eastern Ave., Plymouth, 53073, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.plymouthfurniturewi.com/

Plymouth Furniture has three major aspects that make it great. First is the furniture store that has different fabrics and leather options so you can get the furniture you want the way you want it. Next is the Bedding Showroom which has over 20 styles on display with brands like Sealy, Sealy Posturpedic, Tempur-Pedic and Corsicana. Last and largest is the massive Plymouth Furniture Clearance Center which has overstocks, value priced furniture, scratch and dent deals and just plain great deals.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenhome.jpeg
Aspenhome
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plymouth-furniture.jpeg
Plymouth Furniture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspenhome
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Plymouth Furniture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspenhome in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Plymouth Furniture in 2025.

Incident History — Aspenhome (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspenhome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Plymouth Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Plymouth Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenhome.jpeg
Aspenhome
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plymouth-furniture.jpeg
Plymouth Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Plymouth Furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspenhome company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Plymouth Furniture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspenhome company.

In the current year, Plymouth Furniture company and Aspenhome company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Plymouth Furniture company nor Aspenhome company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Plymouth Furniture company nor Aspenhome company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Plymouth Furniture company nor Aspenhome company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspenhome company nor Plymouth Furniture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspenhome company nor Plymouth Furniture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aspenhome company employs more people globally than Plymouth Furniture company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor Plymouth Furniture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References