Comparison Overview

Aspenhome

VS

ECF Ltd

Aspenhome

601 N. 75th Ave., Phoenix, AZ, US, 85043
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since its inception, aspenhome has expanded from a domestic manufacturer in Phoenix, Arizona, to a global distributor of thoughtfully designed furniture for all rooms of the home. aspenhome creates thoughtfully designed furniture that is fashionable, functional and fun, and responds to the way people work, play and relax at home.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ECF Ltd

Auster House, Rearsby Business Park,, Rearsby, Leicestershire, LE7 4YH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

With over 40 years experience in the manufacture and supply of quality components to the furniture industry, our extensive product range can rival any other in the market place for variety and style. We provide high quality carcassing and stunning made to measure doors for the kitchen, bedroom and bathroom, as well as a wide variety of components including handles and storage solutions. We are also a distributor for Blum drawer systems and hinges, Sensio lighting and Caple sinks, taps, and appliances. We have our own production facility at our head office in rural Leicestershire where our core ranges, Volpi, Gaddesby and Volante are manufactured to the highest of standards. At ECF we aim to provide the very latest styles and finishes to our customers. This is why we place a strong emphasis on ongoing product development and are always trying to incorporate innovative designs into our portfolio. If you are interested in finding out more, please contact us on 01664 424288 or visit our website.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenhome.jpeg
Aspenhome
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecf-ltd.jpeg
ECF Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspenhome
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ECF Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspenhome in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECF Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Aspenhome (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspenhome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ECF Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECF Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenhome.jpeg
Aspenhome
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecf-ltd.jpeg
ECF Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Aspenhome company and ECF Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ECF Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspenhome company.

In the current year, ECF Ltd company and Aspenhome company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ECF Ltd company nor Aspenhome company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ECF Ltd company nor Aspenhome company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ECF Ltd company nor Aspenhome company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspenhome company nor ECF Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspenhome company nor ECF Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aspenhome company employs more people globally than ECF Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspenhome nor ECF Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.