Comparison Overview

Aspen Institute Germany

VS

Technology Leaders Club

Aspen Institute Germany

Friedrichstrasse 60, 10117 Berlin, undefined, undefined, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

The Aspen Institute Germany is an international, nonpartisan, and charitable organization. Its mission is to foster values-based leadership, encouraging individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and to provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussion and acting on critical issues. The individual and social values of the humanistic tradition are promoted through long lasting networks as well as a continued open-minded and critical discourse among top executives from Europe, America, and the whole world. The Aspen Institute Germany achieves its aims through regular meetings of interdisciplinary groups of decision-makers from the fields of academia, the economy, politics, culture, and the media, whose representatives might otherwise meet only rarely or are even in open conflict with each other. At numerous symposia, conferences, and discussion rounds, the Aspen Institute Germany engages in difficult questions of contemporary politics in detailed, candid, and confiding round tables in order to find common solutions for the challenges of our time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Technology Leaders Club

Bath, BA1 1RG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Technology Leaders Club, part of Rela8 Group, is the home to the authentic voice of the tech community. TLC is a sales-free platform where Technology Leaders can gather, share insights, and connect with each other in meaningful ways. Our community of over 10,000 tech executives have priority access to a range of networking and roundtable events, as well as exclusive access to our library of whitepapers, interviews, expert Q&A’s, and much more. Created for, and driven by, the Tech community, the Technology Leaders Club is the jewel in Rela8 Group’s crown.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-institute-germany.jpeg
Aspen Institute Germany
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-leaders-club.jpeg
Technology Leaders Club
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspen Institute Germany
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technology Leaders Club
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Institute Germany in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology Leaders Club in 2025.

Incident History — Aspen Institute Germany (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Institute Germany cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technology Leaders Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology Leaders Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-institute-germany.jpeg
Aspen Institute Germany
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-leaders-club.jpeg
Technology Leaders Club
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aspen Institute Germany company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technology Leaders Club company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technology Leaders Club company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspen Institute Germany company.

In the current year, Technology Leaders Club company and Aspen Institute Germany company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor Aspen Institute Germany company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor Aspen Institute Germany company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor Aspen Institute Germany company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany company nor Technology Leaders Club company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Technology Leaders Club company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aspen Institute Germany company.

Aspen Institute Germany company employs more people globally than Technology Leaders Club company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany nor Technology Leaders Club holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X