Comparison Overview

Aspen Historical Society

VS

Wereldmuseum Rotterdam

Aspen Historical Society

620 W. Bleeker St., Aspen, CO 81611, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Aspen Historical Society (AHS) actively preserves and passionately presents local history in an inspired and provocative manner that will continue to anchor the local community and its evolving character. AHS maintains one of the largest public archives in the region, with a portion of its collection available online as a free resource. AHS operates four historical sites: the Wheeler/Stallard Museum, the Holden/Marolt Mining & Ranching Museum, and the ghost towns of Independence and Ashcroft. AHS provides free history education for local schools, including field programs at the historical sites and in-classroom lessons. Locals and visitors of all ages are invited to explore the history of the upper Roaring Fork Valley with guided tours, programs, and community events offered year-round. Tours (both walking and in the AHS electric vehicle) include the historical downtown core and Aspen’s Victorian West End neighborhood, historical buildings the Hotel Jerome and Wheeler Opera House, and storied sites around the area such as Red Butte Cemetery, rail corridors, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wereldmuseum Rotterdam

Willemskade 22-25, Rotterdam, 3016 DM, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Rotterdam had als grote havenstad een belangrijke rol in de infrastructuur van de imperiale en wereldwijde stromingen van mensen, objecten en ideeën. Deze identiteit zie je terug bij Wereldmuseum Rotterdam in de vorm van tentoonstellingen en programmering over de vele mensen, geschiedenissen en culturen die de wereld vormen en creëren. Thema's als migratie en mobiliteit, maar ook makerschap, materialiteit en globalisering zie je terug in tentoonstellingen als Kolonialisme en Rotterdam, HA!R POWER en Geen woorden maar draden.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-historical-society.jpeg
Aspen Historical Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wereldmuseum-rotterdam.jpeg
Wereldmuseum Rotterdam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aspen Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wereldmuseum Rotterdam
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Historical Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wereldmuseum Rotterdam in 2026.

Incident History — Aspen Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wereldmuseum Rotterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wereldmuseum Rotterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-historical-society.jpeg
Aspen Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wereldmuseum-rotterdam.jpeg
Wereldmuseum Rotterdam
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Aspen Historical Society company and Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aspen Historical Society company.

In the current year, Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company and Aspen Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company nor Aspen Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company nor Aspen Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company nor Aspen Historical Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aspen Historical Society company nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aspen Historical Society company nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aspen Historical Society nor Wereldmuseum Rotterdam holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H