Comparison Overview

Automatic Data Processing

VS

LHH

Automatic Data Processing

115 Market Street, Suite 400, None, Durham, NC, US, 27701
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

ADP is a comprehensive global provider of cloud-based human capital management (HCM) solutions that unite HR, payroll, talent, time, tax and benefits administration, and a leader in business outsourcing services, analytics and compliance expertise. My focus is within ADP's benefit servicing, decision support division headquartered in Durham, North Carolina. Our group owns patented technology in conjoint analysis that it customizes for private and public sector companies.

NAICS: 541612
NAICS Definition: Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees: 311
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LHH

10151 Deerwood Park Boulevard, Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

Welcome to LHH! We're a global leader in HR solutions that future-proofs organizations and careers worldwide. Our Advisory, Career Transition & Mobility, Leadership Development, and Recruitment Solutions enable transformation, and our job is never done because there’s always another tomorrow to prepare for. We make a difference to everyone we work with, and we do it with local expertise, backed by a global infrastructure and industry-leading technology. Our over 8,000 colleagues and coaches span 66 countries worldwide, working with more than 15,000 organizations, a majority of Fortune Global 500, and nearly 500,000 candidates each year. Together we address needs across the entire talent journey, helping organizations build their capabilities and individuals build brighter futures. There is a world of opportunity out there. Let’s get to work.

NAICS: 541612
NAICS Definition: Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees: 16,684
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asparity-decision-solutions.jpeg
Automatic Data Processing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lhhworldwide.jpeg
LHH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Automatic Data Processing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LHH
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Automatic Data Processing in 2025.

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LHH in 2025.

Incident History — Automatic Data Processing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Automatic Data Processing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LHH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LHH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asparity-decision-solutions.jpeg
Automatic Data Processing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lhhworldwide.jpeg
LHH
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Automatic Data Processing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LHH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LHH company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Automatic Data Processing company.

In the current year, LHH company and Automatic Data Processing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LHH company nor Automatic Data Processing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LHH company nor Automatic Data Processing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LHH company nor Automatic Data Processing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Automatic Data Processing company nor LHH company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LHH company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Automatic Data Processing company.

LHH company employs more people globally than Automatic Data Processing company, reflecting its scale as a Human Resources Services.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Automatic Data Processing nor LHH holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H