Comparison Overview

Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC

VS

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP

Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC

5335 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The attorneys of Asmar, Schor & McKenna are recognized leaders in all areas of construction law, commercial real estate transactions and commercial leasing. Our clients are Fortune 100 companies, national homebuilders, international contractors, leading commercial developers and engineering and design professionals. We routinely handle matters in courts across the United States and in tribunals around the world, and provide legal guidance to our clients for construction projects on a regional, national and international scale.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP

9201 N Central Expy, Dallas, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our firm represents clients in matters involving business, commercial and entertainment law based on years of experience in courtroom trials and negotiations across the U.S. We assist large corporations as well as individuals in a variety of industries, including aviation, entertainment, financial institutions, health care, energy, hospitality, real estate, and retail automobile sales. Our firm takes great pride in providing top-caliber legal talent and the ability to scale our efforts to meet our clients’ needs, both now and down the road. We view ourselves as counselors as much as attorneys, helping clients take control of their legal issues and plan for success.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asmar-schor-&-mckenna-pllc.jpeg
Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shackelford-bowen-mckinley-norton-llp.jpeg
Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asmar-schor-&-mckenna-pllc.jpeg
Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shackelford-bowen-mckinley-norton-llp.jpeg
Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company.

In the current year, Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company and Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company nor Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company nor Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company nor Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP company employs more people globally than Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC nor Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X