Comparison Overview

ASIGNO

VS

Fedele and Murray, P.C.

ASIGNO

Paseo de la Castellana, 23 - 1ª planta, Madrid, 28046, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Asigno es hoy líder entre las firmas del sector, no solo por el portfolio de clientes sino también por nuestra tecnología, nuestro equipo humano y los resultados que conseguimos para nuestros clientes. Asigno tiene más de treinta años de experiencia en el tratamiento judicial de deuda para entidades financieras. Hasta el año 2009, ha operado en el mercado bajo el nombre de Legalia, donde la firma pasa a denominarse Grupo Lener, con la creación de dos nuevas marcas: lener y Asigno, teniendo ésta singularidad propia, debido a las exigencias de gestión separada del resto de las áreas que requiere nuestra actividad. Nuestra alta especialización justifica nuestra propia autonomía dentro del Grupo Lener, dando una respuesta más personalizada a los clientes, combinando la gestión amistosa dentro de los procedimientos judiciales.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fedele and Murray, P.C.

17 Walpole St, Norwood, Massachusetts, 02062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Fedele and Murray, P.C. is a professional corporation offering complete legal services to individuals, corporations, institutions, and estates. The base of the firm's practice consists of: Estate Planning Estate Administration Family and Domestic Relations Law Corporate Tax and Financial Planning Real Estate Charitable Giving Taxation The attorneys and clients of the firm are supported by an experienced staff and an infrastructure that includes state of the art computer and software systems, including specialized software systems relating particularly to the firm's estate planning and estate administration practice developed by Mr. Fedele.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asigno.jpeg
ASIGNO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fedele-and-murray-p.c..jpeg
Fedele and Murray, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ASIGNO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fedele and Murray, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASIGNO in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fedele and Murray, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — ASIGNO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASIGNO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fedele and Murray, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fedele and Murray, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asigno.jpeg
ASIGNO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fedele-and-murray-p.c..jpeg
Fedele and Murray, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ASIGNO company and Fedele and Murray, P.C. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fedele and Murray, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ASIGNO company.

In the current year, Fedele and Murray, P.C. company and ASIGNO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fedele and Murray, P.C. company nor ASIGNO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fedele and Murray, P.C. company nor ASIGNO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fedele and Murray, P.C. company nor ASIGNO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ASIGNO company nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ASIGNO company nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ASIGNO company employs more people globally than Fedele and Murray, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ASIGNO nor Fedele and Murray, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X