Comparison Overview

Asiana Airlines

VS

Lufthansa

Asiana Airlines

Asiana Town, Gangseo-Gu, 157-713, KR
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 650 and 699

(Overview) Asiana Airlines is an airline based in Seoul, Korea. As a member of the Star Alliance, Asiana operates over 90 routes to 77 cities in 21 countries worldwide. (Mission) Fullfilling customer satisfaction by providing the best in safety, services, and comfort to the body and mind while traveling – Asiana Airlines pursues these values in the name of excellent service and safety. Aiming to become the world’s best carrier, Asiana Airlines realizes the importance of high growth and revenue thorough Customer Satisfaction Management. Asiana’s beautiful take-off towards the future continues.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,269
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Lufthansa

Airportring, Frankfurt am Main, 60549, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Lufthansa is one of the world’s leading airlines, connecting passengers to over 200 destinations across 74 countries from our hubs in Frankfurt and Munich. As an industry pioneer, we are committed to shaping the future of sustainable aviation, investing in next-generation aircraft, cutting-edge technology, and digital solutions. Our goal is to drive excellence: not just in the sky, but across every touchpoint of the travel experience. With Lufthansa Allegris, our new long-haul experience, we are setting a new standard in premium travel, introducing a completely redesigned First, Business, Premium Economy, and Economy Class for ultimate comfort and choice. We continue to enhance the travel experience with state-of-the-art lounges, award-winning service, and onboard broadband Wi-Fi (FlyNet) across our entire long-haul fleet. Follow us for updates on how we're shaping the future of aviation. For more information, reservations or customer service, visit lufthansa.com or follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram. We look forward to welcoming you onboard. This LinkedIn page is maintained by Deutsche Lufthansa AG. We will not answer specific Customer Service queries here on LinkedIn. If you have an immediate concern or need to contact us please visit http://www.lufthansa.com/us/en/imprint

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 19,352
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiana-airlines.jpeg
Asiana Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa.jpeg
Lufthansa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asiana Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lufthansa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Asiana Airlines has 58.73% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa in 2025.

Incident History — Asiana Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asiana Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lufthansa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiana-airlines.jpeg
Asiana Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to overseas server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa.jpeg
Lufthansa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lufthansa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asiana Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Asiana Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lufthansa company has not reported any.

In the current year, Asiana Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than Lufthansa company.

Neither Lufthansa company nor Asiana Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Asiana Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lufthansa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lufthansa company nor Asiana Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asiana Airlines company nor Lufthansa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lufthansa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Asiana Airlines company.

Lufthansa company employs more people globally than Asiana Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Lufthansa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N