Comparison Overview

Asiana Airlines

VS

JetBlue

Asiana Airlines

Asiana Town, Gangseo-Gu, 157-713, KR
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 650 and 699

(Overview) Asiana Airlines is an airline based in Seoul, Korea. As a member of the Star Alliance, Asiana operates over 90 routes to 77 cities in 21 countries worldwide. (Mission) Fullfilling customer satisfaction by providing the best in safety, services, and comfort to the body and mind while traveling – Asiana Airlines pursues these values in the name of excellent service and safety. Aiming to become the world’s best carrier, Asiana Airlines realizes the importance of high growth and revenue thorough Customer Satisfaction Management. Asiana’s beautiful take-off towards the future continues.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,269
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

JetBlue

27-01 Queens Plaza North, Long Island City, New York, 11101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

When JetBlue first took flight in February 2000, our founding goal was to bring humanity back to air travel, and over two decades later, we still put our customers, crewmembers and communities at the center of everything we do. Before we even had aircraft to fly, our founders selected five values to guide us, which are safety, caring, integrity, passion and fun. These core values shape our culture and empower our 23,000 crewmembers to deliver a meaningful JetBlue experience to more than 40 million customers that fly with us each year to more than 100 cities across the United States, Latin America, Caribbean, Canada and Europe. We’re proud to be New York's Hometown Airline®, and a leading carrier in Boston, Fort Lauderdale - Hollywood, Los Angeles, Orlando, and San Juan. Please note: If you have concerns or complaints that require response, please visit http://jetblue.com/chat.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 16,257
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiana-airlines.jpeg
Asiana Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jetblue-airways.jpeg
JetBlue
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asiana Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JetBlue
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Asiana Airlines has 58.73% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JetBlue in 2025.

Incident History — Asiana Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asiana Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JetBlue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JetBlue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiana-airlines.jpeg
Asiana Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to overseas server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jetblue-airways.jpeg
JetBlue
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JetBlue company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asiana Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Asiana Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas JetBlue company has not reported any.

In the current year, Asiana Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than JetBlue company.

Neither JetBlue company nor Asiana Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Asiana Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other JetBlue company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JetBlue company nor Asiana Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asiana Airlines company nor JetBlue company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JetBlue company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Asiana Airlines company.

JetBlue company employs more people globally than Asiana Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor JetBlue holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N