Comparison Overview

Asiafruit China

VS

Gill

Asiafruit China

77a Stubbs, Kensington , Melbourne, VIC 3031, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://asiafruitchina.net

Brought to you by the publishers of ASIAFRUIT, ASIAFRUIT CHINA is a Chinese-language service dedicated to the fresh produce industry in China. It delivers the latest news and developments in the local and international fresh fruit and vegetable business. Available online and in print, ASIAFRUIT CHINA offers global suppliers a high-quality platform to promote their business to the Chinese trade. 亚洲水果中国由《Asiafruit 亚洲水果》杂志出版方打造，是服务中国果蔬行业的新闻资讯与营销服务平台。亚洲水果报道中国本土市场和全球果蔬业的最新新闻动态。高品质的独家资讯和行业观点，通过官方网站、微信订阅号和新闻电邮每日在线更新，也定期推出《亚洲水果》中文特刊杂志，是全球供应商向中国行业推广公司产品与服务的最佳平台。

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gill

Hume Avenue, Dublin, Ireland, D12 YV96, IE
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gill.ie/

Gill is Ireland's leading book publisher and distributor. Gill Books is Ireland's largest Irish-interest trade publisher. Gill Education is one of Ireland's leading educational publishers. Gill Distribution provides full-service distribution services to more than 50 publisher clients. A Short History In 1856 Michael Henry Gill, who was then printer to Dublin University, purchased the publishing and book selling business of James McGlashan and formed the company of McGlashan & Gill. In 1875 the name was changed to M.H. Gill & Son. In 1968 Gill & Macmillan was established as a result of an association with Macmillan of London which in turn had been founded in 1843. In 2013 the Gill family purchased the Macmillan shareholding in the company, returning it to full Irish ownership. Today, Gill is one of Ireland’s leading publishers both of educational content for primary and post-primary schools, and of general interest titles on every aspect of Irish life. We also provide distribution services to 50+ client publishers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 287
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiafruit-china.jpeg
Asiafruit China
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gill-&-macmillan.jpeg
Gill
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asiafruit China
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gill
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asiafruit China in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gill in 2025.

Incident History — Asiafruit China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asiafruit China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiafruit-china.jpeg
Asiafruit China
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gill-&-macmillan.jpeg
Gill
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gill company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asiafruit China company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gill company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Asiafruit China company.

In the current year, Gill company and Asiafruit China company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gill company nor Asiafruit China company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gill company nor Asiafruit China company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gill company nor Asiafruit China company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asiafruit China company nor Gill company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Asiafruit China company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gill company.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asiafruit China nor Gill holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References