Comparison Overview

Ashtabula County, Ohio

VS

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Ashtabula County, Ohio

44047, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

County Government

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 229
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Lehae La Sars, Pretoria, 0001, ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection against the illegal importation and exportation of goods; facilitate trade; and advise the Minister of Finance on all revenue matters

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,341
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ashtabula County, Ohio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sars.jpeg
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ashtabula County, Ohio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ashtabula County, Ohio in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2026.

Incident History — Ashtabula County, Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ashtabula County, Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ashtabula County, Ohio
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sars.jpeg
South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ashtabula County, Ohio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ashtabula County, Ohio company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported any.

In the current year, South African Revenue Service (SARS) company and Ashtabula County, Ohio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South African Revenue Service (SARS) company nor Ashtabula County, Ohio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ashtabula County, Ohio company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither South African Revenue Service (SARS) company nor Ashtabula County, Ohio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio company nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio company nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South African Revenue Service (SARS) company employs more people globally than Ashtabula County, Ohio company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ashtabula County, Ohio nor South African Revenue Service (SARS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.