Comparison Overview

Ashley Addiction Treatment

VS

LifeWorks,Inc.

Ashley Addiction Treatment

800 Tydings Lane, Havre de Grace, Maryland, US, 21078
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Ashley Addiction Treatment is one of the leading addiction treatment centers in the U.S. As a nonprofit leader, our mission to transform and save lives through the science of medicine, the art of therapy, and the compassion of spirituality, is at the forefront of everything we do. We know that a substance use disorder is not a choice but a disease, and we use every tool available to achieve complete healing for our patients and drive innovation in the addiction treatment field. Our evidence-based, holistic treatment encompasses the mind, body and spirit to achieve lifelong recovery and is complemented by our principle to treat everyone with dignity and respect while providing empathetic and compassionate care. Our tranquil campus in Havre de Grace, MD, nestled on the Chesapeake Bay, provides the perfect retreat for an inpatient treatment experience in a comforting environment of healing. For those who need additional support to transition from inpatient to outpatient care, we offer extended care in Bel Air and Churchville, MD. To provide a less intensive treatment setting, we offer outpatient services in Elkton and Bel Air, MD. Our expert staff implements personalized treatment plans addressing each patient’s unique needs.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 247
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LifeWorks,Inc.

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Therapy Services Therapists at LifeWorks are Licensed at the Master’s or Independent level. A list of therapists, insurance accepted and specialties can be found under the counseling tab. Remedial Services Counselors provide skill-building services that help reduce or end problem behaviors. Counselors assist children in learning age appropriate ways to manage their behavior. Remedial Services are action-oriented services in which a child and their family work with the provider and demonstrate the skills being taught. Interventions focus on Conflict resolution, Problem solving, social skills, Relationship skills, and Communication. Services can be provided in client’s residence, the community or the office. Children’s Mental Health (Waiver Services) A licensed professional (master’s degree) provides services to children with serious emotional disturbances. These services include in-home family therapy

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashley-addiction-treatment.jpeg
Ashley Addiction Treatment
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeworks-inc-.jpeg
LifeWorks,Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ashley Addiction Treatment
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LifeWorks,Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ashley Addiction Treatment in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LifeWorks,Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Ashley Addiction Treatment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ashley Addiction Treatment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LifeWorks,Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LifeWorks,Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashley-addiction-treatment.jpeg
Ashley Addiction Treatment
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeworks-inc-.jpeg
LifeWorks,Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LifeWorks,Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ashley Addiction Treatment company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LifeWorks,Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ashley Addiction Treatment company.

In the current year, LifeWorks,Inc. company and Ashley Addiction Treatment company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LifeWorks,Inc. company nor Ashley Addiction Treatment company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LifeWorks,Inc. company nor Ashley Addiction Treatment company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LifeWorks,Inc. company nor Ashley Addiction Treatment company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment company nor LifeWorks,Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment company nor LifeWorks,Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ashley Addiction Treatment company employs more people globally than LifeWorks,Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ashley Addiction Treatment nor LifeWorks,Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N