Comparison Overview

Ascot Care

VS

ServingIntel

Ascot Care

4 Horsley Hill Road, South Shields, NE33 3DY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

We are a family-owned care group over 30 years of experience across two generations. Through our portfolio of residential, home care, and live-in care services, we provide exceptional care services for the elderly, with high quality standards and a personal touch, across the North East of England. About Ascot Care Homes: We operate seven care homes for over 65s in Horden, Seaburn, Alnwick, Darlington, Durham, Whitley Bay, and South Shields, as well as a Brain Injury and Challenging Behaviours suite in Darlington. Our homes are registered to offer a range of residential care services, including nursing, dementia, physical disability and sensory impairment, and can also accommodate palliative, respite and day care. For residential care enquiries, call our Ascot Care Homes team on 0191 493 6920. About Ascot Care Agency: Ascot Care Agency is our home care and live-in care service, delivering tailored support to older people and those with complex needs, in the comfort of their own home. Our Agency is also equiped to provide temporary staffing solutions to private individuals and organisations, covering qualified nurses and support workers. For home care, live-in care and temporary staffing enquiries, call the Ascot Care Agency team on 01325 384383.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ServingIntel

18W140 Butterfield Rd, Oakbrook Terrace, 60181, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

ServingIntel is a leading provider of point-of-sale and integrated software solutions designed for Senior Living communities. Our roots are in the restaurant industry, observing and leveraging the impact of technology to grow and expand our capabilities around a shared passion to fulfill a greater purpose and impact by serving others. We were brought into the Senior Living market by the industry leader, which initiated our journey to deeply understand and appreciate the sector's unique needs. Today, we are singularly focused on enhancing our insights and technology capabilities for Senior Living through product development and collaboration with integration partners. ServingIntel is your guide to navigating change, with the leading-edge capabilities and seamless collaboration to deliver results.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascotcarenortheast.jpeg
Ascot Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servingintel.jpeg
ServingIntel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ascot Care
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ServingIntel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ascot Care in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ServingIntel in 2025.

Incident History — Ascot Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascot Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ServingIntel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ServingIntel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascotcarenortheast.jpeg
Ascot Care
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servingintel.jpeg
ServingIntel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ascot Care company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ServingIntel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ServingIntel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ascot Care company.

In the current year, ServingIntel company and Ascot Care company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ServingIntel company nor Ascot Care company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ServingIntel company nor Ascot Care company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ServingIntel company nor Ascot Care company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ascot Care company nor ServingIntel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ServingIntel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ascot Care company.

Ascot Care company employs more people globally than ServingIntel company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ascot Care nor ServingIntel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N