Comparison Overview

Ascom

VS

SoftwareOne

Ascom

Ascom Holding AG, Zugerstrasse 32, Baar, ZG, CH, 6340
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

Our vision is a world where the right information moves people forward. Our mission is to put the right information in the right hands at the right time so that people can make the best possible decisions. We are a global provider of communication and collaboration solutions for the acute care, long-term care and enterprise sectors. Our solutions are based on intelligent integrations with software and hardware that are open source and compatible with third party solutions. Every single second, our systems generate large amounts of data, which we then turn into useful and actionable information. This helps us to bring data to life for people in the toughest operational environments, ensuring smooth, complete, and efficient workflows. Ascom is headquartered in Baar (Switzerland), has operating businesses in 19 countries and employs around 1,400 people worldwide. Ascom registered shares (ASCN) are listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange in Zurich.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 1,549
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

SoftwareOne

Riedenmatt 4, Stans, CH, 6370
Last Update: 2025-12-09

SoftwareOne is a leading global software and cloud solutions provider that is redefining how companies build, buy and manage everything in the cloud. By helping clients to migrate and modernize their workloads and applications – and in parallel, to navigate and optimize the resulting software and cloud changes – SoftwareOne unlocks the value of technology. The company’s 8,900 employees are driven to deliver a portfolio of 7,500 software brands with sales and delivery capabilities in 90 countries. Headquartered in Switzerland, SoftwareOne is listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange under the ticker symbol SWON. Visit us: https://www.softwareone.com/en

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,240
Subsidiaries: 51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascom.jpeg
Ascom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softwareone.jpeg
SoftwareOne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ascom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SoftwareOne
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Ascom has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne in 2025.

Incident History — Ascom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SoftwareOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftwareOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascom.jpeg
Ascom
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Server Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softwareone.jpeg
SoftwareOne
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SoftwareOne company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ascom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ascom company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SoftwareOne company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ascom company has reported more cyber incidents than SoftwareOne company.

Neither SoftwareOne company nor Ascom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ascom company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SoftwareOne company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SoftwareOne company nor Ascom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ascom company nor SoftwareOne company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SoftwareOne company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ascom company.

SoftwareOne company employs more people globally than Ascom company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ascom nor SoftwareOne holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N