Comparison Overview

Ascom

VS

NEC Corporation

Ascom

Ascom Holding AG, Zugerstrasse 32, Baar, ZG, CH, 6340
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.ascom.com

Our vision is a world where the right information moves people forward. Our mission is to put the right information in the right hands at the right time so that people can make the best possible decisions. We are a global provider of communication and collaboration solutions for the acute care, long-term care and enterprise sectors. Our solutions are based on intelligent integrations with software and hardware that are open source and compatible with third party solutions. Every single second, our systems generate large amounts of data, which we then turn into useful and actionable information. This helps us to bring data to life for people in the toughest operational environments, ensuring smooth, complete, and efficient workflows. Ascom is headquartered in Baar (Switzerland), has operating businesses in 19 countries and employs around 1,400 people worldwide. Ascom registered shares (ASCN) are listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange in Zurich.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 1,549
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

NEC Corporation

7-1, Shiba 5-chome, Tokyo, 108-8001, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.nec.com/en/

NEC Corporation has established itself as a leader in the integration of IT and network technologies while promoting the brand statement of “Orchestrating a brighter world.” NEC enables businesses and communities to adapt to rapid changes taking place in both society and the market as it provides for the social values of safety, security, fairness and efficiency to promote a more sustainable world where everyone has the chance to reach their full potential. For more information, visit NEC at http://www.nec.com NEC's Strengths and Competencies ・Named "2017 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World"​ an Index Listing the World’s 100 Most Sustainable Corporations ・Named one of the "World's Top 100 Most Innovative Organizations for 2016"​ by Thomson Reuters ・Face recognition technology achieved No. 1 in the recent Face in Video Evaluation (FIVE, *1) testing performed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (*2) (*1) https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/face-video-evaluation-five (*2) Results shown from the Face In Video Evaluation (FIVE), the Multiple Biometric Grand Challenge (MBGC), the Multiple Biometric Evaluation (MBE) and the Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) do not constitute endorsement of any particular product by the U.S. Government. ** Please note that we reserve the right to delete any comments posted on NEC Corporation’s LinkedIn page that are deemed extremely defamatory or libelous to any company or individual, or that may be offensive to others.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,837
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascom.jpeg
Ascom
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec.jpeg
NEC Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ascom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEC Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Ascom has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Ascom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEC Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascom.jpeg
Ascom
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Server Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec.jpeg
NEC Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEC Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ascom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ascom company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NEC Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ascom company has reported more cyber incidents than NEC Corporation company.

Neither NEC Corporation company nor Ascom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ascom company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NEC Corporation company nor Ascom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ascom company nor NEC Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NEC Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ascom company.

NEC Corporation company employs more people globally than Ascom company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ascom nor NEC Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References