Comparison Overview

Ascension

VS

Lehigh Valley Health Network

Ascension

101 South Hanley Rd., Suite 450, St. Louis, MO, US, 63105
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all, with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY2025, Ascension provided $1.7 billion in care of persons living in poverty and other community benefit programs along with $1.8 billion of unreimbursed care for Medicare patients. Across 16 states and the District of Columbia, Ascension’s network encompasses approximately 99,000 associates, 22,300 aligned providers, 95 wholly owned or consolidated hospitals, and ownership interests in 26 additional hospitals through partnerships. Ascension also operates 30 senior living facilities and a variety of other care sites offering a range of healthcare services.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 66,110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Lehigh Valley Health Network

1200 S Cedar Crest Blvd, Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN) is proudly part of Jefferson Health, forming a leading integrated academic health care delivery system. With 65,000 colleagues, 32 hospitals and over 700 sites of care across the Lehigh Valley, northeastern Pennsylvania, Delaware Valley and southern New Jersey. LVHN’s mission is to heal, comfort and care for our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care, supported by education and clinical research. LVHN's rich history, spanning over 125 years, is rooted in a commitment to exceptional care and innovation. Our values—compassion, integrity, collaboration and excellence—guide us in delivering superior health care every day. LVHN’s Social Engagement Policy: The mission of LVHN’s social channels is to inspire, engage and inform our community about our services and to help you live a healthier life. We encourage healthy and productive conversation and welcome a diversity of opinions. However, we do not tolerate harassment, disparaging comments, profanity, libelous statements, malicious misinformation, political campaigning, spamming, solicitation, racism, hate speech or any other inappropriate behavior. We reserve the right to remove comments and ban users who participate in unproductive or harmful activities. Our goal is to maintain a respectful and supportive environment for everyone.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,542
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascensionorg.jpeg
Ascension
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-valley-hospital.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ascension
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lehigh Valley Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Ascension has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lehigh Valley Health Network in 2025.

Incident History — Ascension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lehigh Valley Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lehigh Valley Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascensionorg.jpeg
Ascension
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability in third-party software
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-valley-hospital.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lehigh Valley Health Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ascension company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ascension company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lehigh Valley Health Network company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ascension company has reported more cyber incidents than Lehigh Valley Health Network company.

Ascension company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lehigh Valley Health Network company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ascension company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lehigh Valley Health Network company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Ascension company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ascension company nor Lehigh Valley Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lehigh Valley Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ascension company.

Ascension company employs more people globally than Lehigh Valley Health Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ascension nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N