Comparison Overview

AscendRural

VS

Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC)

AscendRural

202 12th St NE, None, Staples, Minnesota, US, 56479
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

AscendRural is a technology-driven innovation hub dedicated to boosting well-being in rural America. Initiated by Sourcewell, it embodies their commitment to helping communities thrive. We bring together local leaders and the innovation community to pilot technology solutions in central Minnesota. Our goal is to address accessibility, availability, and affordability issues while accounting for what makes rural communities unique.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC)

None, None, Boston, MA, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) works in collaboration with the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) and the Office on Women’s Health (OWH) in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health to address the needs of Title X family planning service delivery grantees and Teen Pregnancy Prevention (TPP) grantees through training and technical assistance (TA). The RHNTC exists to ensure that personnel working in OPA-funded Title X and TPP projects have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to deliver high-quality services and programs. The RHNTC is managed by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascendrural.jpeg
AscendRural
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhntc.jpeg
Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AscendRural
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AscendRural in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) in 2025.

Incident History — AscendRural (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AscendRural cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascendrural.jpeg
AscendRural
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhntc.jpeg
Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AscendRural company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AscendRural company.

In the current year, Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company and AscendRural company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company nor AscendRural company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company nor AscendRural company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company nor AscendRural company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AscendRural company nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AscendRural company nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AscendRural company employs more people globally than Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AscendRural nor Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H