Comparison Overview

Ascend Recovery

VS

Advent Prestige Care LLC

Ascend Recovery

6595 S 100 W, American Fork, 84003, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Ascend Recovery is a cutting edge residential drug and alcohol treatment center that synthesizes the best medical expertise offered by several different modalities. We are a dual diagnosis center specializing in treating the disease of drug and alcohol addiction, as well as any underlying mental health issues. Ascend employs therapeutic techniques that utilize group and individual therapy, experiential therapies, western physical assessment, and medical intervention. In addition, Ascend Recovery uses holistic healing techniques, such as a specialized nutrition program and a core family program that helps families understand the intersection of addiction and mental health.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advent Prestige Care LLC

Port Saint Lucie, None, Florida, None, US, 34953
Last Update: 2026-01-22

ADVENT PRESTIGE CARE LLC is a mental health therapy and relationship counseling organization committed to bringing health, wellness, and happiness to the society. The organization operates under the capable leadership of Sheryl Palmer, a passionate trainer, mentor, and mental health consultant. ADVENT PRESTIGE CARE LLC utilizes a holistic approach to your health by providing a wide range of therapies that are tailored to help you with your path to healing and recovery. We specialize in group therapy, individual therapy, family and couple therapy, and Christian counseling. We also provide counseling and coaching services that are dedicated to helping you grow and achieve the various challenges in your life. Our family and relationship consultation services are aimed to strengthen your bond relationship with family, relatives, and community members. At ADVENT PRESTIGE CARE LLC, we understand the complex and vast world of mind, psychology, and philosophy and provide the exact solutions to our customers according to their needs and concerning problems. We understand that everyone’s path to wellness looks differently as everyone heals in their own different way. We believe that everyone who travels down the road of wellness from emotional, behavioral, and psychological challenges must be treated with respect, care, and empathy. Our mission is to build and maintain an emotionally strong community by providing confidential, affordable, and transformative counseling and psychotherapy services. Contact us: [email protected]

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascend-recovery.jpeg
Ascend Recovery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advent-prestige-care.jpeg
Advent Prestige Care LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ascend Recovery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advent Prestige Care LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ascend Recovery in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advent Prestige Care LLC in 2026.

Incident History — Ascend Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascend Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advent Prestige Care LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advent Prestige Care LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascend-recovery.jpeg
Ascend Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advent-prestige-care.jpeg
Advent Prestige Care LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ascend Recovery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advent Prestige Care LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Advent Prestige Care LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ascend Recovery company.

In the current year, Advent Prestige Care LLC company and Ascend Recovery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advent Prestige Care LLC company nor Ascend Recovery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Advent Prestige Care LLC company nor Ascend Recovery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advent Prestige Care LLC company nor Ascend Recovery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ascend Recovery company nor Advent Prestige Care LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ascend Recovery company nor Advent Prestige Care LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ascend Recovery company employs more people globally than Advent Prestige Care LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ascend Recovery nor Advent Prestige Care LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N