Comparison Overview

Asahi Kasei

VS

AkzoNobel

Asahi Kasei

1-1-2 Yurakucho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Tokyo, JP, 100-0006
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Asahi Kasei Group contributes to life and living for people around the world. Since its foundation in 1922 with ammonia and cellulose fiber business, Asahi Kasei has consistently grown through the proactive transformation of its business portfolio to meet the evolving needs of every age. With more than 48,000 employees around the world, the company contributes to sustainable society by providing solutions to the world’s challenges through its three business sectors of Material, Homes, and Health Care.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 10,499
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

AkzoNobel

Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, 1077 WW, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We’re active in more than 150 countries and use our expertise to sustain and enhance everyday life. Because we believe every surface is an opportunity. It’s what you’d expect from a pioneering and long-established paints company that’s dedicated to providing sustainable solutions and preserving the best of what we have today – while creating an even better tomorrow. Let’s paint the future together.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 30,456
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asahi-kasei.jpeg
Asahi Kasei
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akzonobel.jpeg
AkzoNobel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asahi Kasei
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AkzoNobel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asahi Kasei in 2025.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AkzoNobel in 2025.

Incident History — Asahi Kasei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asahi Kasei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asahi-kasei.jpeg
Asahi Kasei
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Hack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akzonobel.jpeg
AkzoNobel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Asahi Kasei company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AkzoNobel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Asahi Kasei company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AkzoNobel company has not reported any.

In the current year, AkzoNobel company and Asahi Kasei company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AkzoNobel company nor Asahi Kasei company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Asahi Kasei company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AkzoNobel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AkzoNobel company nor Asahi Kasei company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asahi Kasei company nor AkzoNobel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Asahi Kasei company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AkzoNobel company.

AkzoNobel company employs more people globally than Asahi Kasei company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asahi Kasei nor AkzoNobel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H