Comparison Overview

As One Foundation

VS

Algoma Family Services Foundation

As One Foundation

undefined, undefined, undefined, 77494, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.asonefoundation.org

Globally provides support and development of under-served youth and their families through education, athletics, and spiritual enrichment. As One’s core programs include the annual Devard & Devaughn Darling Football Camps for Bahamians boys & Nassau & Freeport every summer as well as the Devard and Devaughn Darling High School Senior Award which is awarded to ten high school seniors in honor of the late Devaughn Darling who was an excellent student in the classroom, exceptional team player on the field, and student of great character.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Algoma Family Services Foundation

undefined, Sault Ste. Marie, undefined, undefined, ca
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.afsfoundation.ca

Algoma Family Services Foundation is the only Foundation in the Algoma District dedicated to supporting the mission of Algoma Family Services by raising funds to support children with mental health problems and their families. The Foundation... • Promotes the services of Algoma Family Services to generate heightened community awareness of the specific needs of children with mental health problems and the programs and services available to assist them • Provides meaningful opportunities for the community to help resource mental health programs for children and youth in Algoma which would otherwise not be available through provincial funding. • Engage in fundraising activities that ensure community respect and support for children with mental health problems. • Ensure strong stewardship in the management of all entrusted funds.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/as-one-foundation.jpeg
As One Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/algoma-family-services-foundation.jpeg
Algoma Family Services Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
As One Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Algoma Family Services Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for As One Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Algoma Family Services Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — As One Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

As One Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Algoma Family Services Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Algoma Family Services Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/as-one-foundation.jpeg
As One Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/algoma-family-services-foundation.jpeg
Algoma Family Services Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Algoma Family Services Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to As One Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Algoma Family Services Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to As One Foundation company.

In the current year, Algoma Family Services Foundation company and As One Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Algoma Family Services Foundation company nor As One Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Algoma Family Services Foundation company nor As One Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Algoma Family Services Foundation company nor As One Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither As One Foundation company nor Algoma Family Services Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither As One Foundation company nor Algoma Family Services Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Algoma Family Services Foundation company employs more people globally than As One Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither As One Foundation nor Algoma Family Services Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References