Comparison Overview

ArtMoorHouse

VS

Historic Columbia

ArtMoorHouse

undefined, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5ET, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.artmoorhouse.com

Norman Foster's building provides the setting for a successful synergy between Art and Business. ArtMoorHouse is a new creative space in the heart of the City. Our aim is to provide a rolling programme of high-profile Fine art and Design exhibitions and events. From internationally acclaimed and well-established artists to emerging talents, ArtMoorHouse strives to engage, inspire and provide a talking point and an ice breaker in the banking and commercial environment. Thanks to the collaboration with prestigious national and international galleries, sponsors and supporters, ArtMoorHouse aim to present itself as a hub, a meeting point of diverse synergies in order to create a network of interactions between the art world, design and business.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Historic Columbia

1601 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 29201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.historiccolumbia.org

In November 1961, a small group of individuals intent on saving the Ainsley Hall House from demolition officially incorporated as the Historic Columbia. Over the next five decades the organization, which was founded on the premise of preservation and education, would take on the stewardship of seven historic properties in Richland County. Today, the organization serves as a model for local preservation efforts and interpretation of local history. Visit historiccolumbia.org or find us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or YouTube for more details. www.historiccolumbia.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artmoorhouse.jpeg
ArtMoorHouse
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-columbia-foundation.jpeg
Historic Columbia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ArtMoorHouse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Columbia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArtMoorHouse in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Columbia in 2026.

Incident History — ArtMoorHouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArtMoorHouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Columbia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Columbia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artmoorhouse.jpeg
ArtMoorHouse
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-columbia-foundation.jpeg
Historic Columbia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Columbia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ArtMoorHouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic Columbia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ArtMoorHouse company.

In the current year, Historic Columbia company and ArtMoorHouse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Columbia company nor ArtMoorHouse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Columbia company nor ArtMoorHouse company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Columbia company nor ArtMoorHouse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ArtMoorHouse company nor Historic Columbia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ArtMoorHouse company nor Historic Columbia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Columbia company employs more people globally than ArtMoorHouse company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ArtMoorHouse nor Historic Columbia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References